🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Abstract

In this paper, we find upper bounds for the first two Taylor-Maclaurin || and || for two new families , ;  and ∗ , ;  of holomorphic and -fold symmetric bi-univalent functions associated with the Bazilevic convex functions defined in the open unit disk . Further, we point out several certain special cases for our results.

Results & Lemmas (7)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1.1 · coeff Lemma 1.1 [3]. If ℎ∈[, then | '| ≤2 for each ] ∈ℕ, where [ is the family of all  all functions ℎ holomorphic in  for which ^Y6ℎ 7 > 0,…
Lemma 1.1 [3]. If ℎ∈[, then |\'| ≤2 for each ] ∈ℕ, where [ is the family of all  all functions ℎ holomorphic in  for which ^Y6ℎ 7 > 0,  ∈, where ℎ  = 1 + \ + \ + ⋯,  ∈. 2. Coefficient Estimates for the Function Family _` a, b; c
Theorem 2.1. Theorem 2.1. Let  ∈, ;  0 <  ≤1, 0 ≤ ≤1, 0 ≤ ≤1,  ∈ℕ be given by (1.3). Then || ≤ 2 op2 q 1 −  2 +  + 2 2 + 1 +   1…
Theorem 2.1. Let  ∈ , ;  0 <  ≤1, 0 ≤ ≤1, 0 ≤ ≤1,  ∈ℕ be given by (1.3). Then || ≤ 2 op2 q 1 −  2 +  + 2 2 + 1 +   1 −   −1 2  +  + r + 1 −J 1 −   +  +   + 1K p 2.3 and || ≤ 4 J 1 −   +  +   + 1K +
Corollary 2.1. Corollary 2.1. Let  ∈, ;  0 <  ≤1,0 ≤ ≤1, 0 ≤ ≤1 be given by (1.1). Then
Corollary 2.1. Let  ∈ , ;  0 <  ≤1,0 ≤ ≤1, 0 ≤ ≤1 be given by (1.1). Then
Theorem 1 · coeff Theorem 1]. 3. Coefficient Estimates for the Function Family _` ∗ a, b; 
Theorem 1]. 3. Coefficient Estimates for the Function Family _` ∗ a, b; {
Theorem 3.1. Theorem 3.1. Let  ∈
Theorem 3.1. Let  ∈
Corollary 3.1. Corollary 3.1. Let  ∈ ∗, ;  0 ≤ < 1, 0 ≤ ≤1, 0 ≤ ≤1 be given by (1.1). Then || ≤o 2 1 − z 1 −  2 +  + 6 +   1 −   −1 2 1…
Corollary 3.1. Let  ∈ ∗ , ;  0 ≤ < 1, 0 ≤ ≤1, 0 ≤ ≤1 be given by (1.1). Then || ≤o 2 1 − z 1 −  2 +  + 6 +   1 −   −1 2 1 +  + z
Theorem 2 Theorem 2]. 4. Conclusion The present study has introduced a new subfamilies, ; and
Theorem 2]. 4. Conclusion The present study has introduced a new subfamilies , ; and

Definitions (2)

Def 2.1. Definition 2.1. A function  ∈D given by (1.3) is said to be in the family
Definition 2.1. A function  ∈D given by (1.3) is said to be in the family
Def 3.1. Definition 3.1. A function  ∈D given by (1.3) is said to be in the family
Definition 3.1. A function  ∈D given by (1.3) is said to be in the family
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Geometric Properties of Analytic Functions Defined by the Miller–Ross-Type Poiss
2026
Texture enhancement of skin lesion images via Hankel determinants of $\lambda$-g
2026
Stud. Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai Math. 71(2026), No. 2, 235–252
2026
Coefficient Estimates and Distortion Bounds for Rabotnov Functions with Applicat
2026
On some properties of bi-univalent functions in the unit disc
2026
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #5,181 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback