🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Abstract

In this paper, we introduce and investigate a new subclass of bi-prestarlike functions defined in the open unit disk, associated with Chebyshev Polynomials. Furthermore, we find estimates of first two coefficients of functions in these classes, making use of the Chebyshev polynomials. Also, we obtain the Fekete-Szegö inequalities for function in these classes. Several consequences of the results are also pointed out as corollaries.

Results & Lemmas (6)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 2.1. Theorem 2.1. Let f given by (1.1) be in the class RΣ(λ, α, Φ(z, t)) and t ∈(0, 1). Then |a2| ≤ 2t √ 2t p |[2(1 + 2λ)Ψ3(α) −(λ2 + 5λ + 2)Ψ2…
Theorem 2.1. Let f given by (1.1) be in the class RΣ(λ, α, Φ(z, t)) and t ∈(0, 1). Then |a2| ≤ 2t √ 2t p |[2(1 + 2λ)Ψ3(α) −(λ2 + 5λ + 2)Ψ2 2(α)]4t2 + (1 + λ)2Ψ2 2(α)| (2.1) and |a3| ≤ 4t2 (1 + λ)2Ψ2 2(α) +
Corollary 2.4. Corollary 2.4. Let f given by (1.1) be in the class RΣ(λ, 0, Φ(z, t)). Then |a2| ≤ t √ 2t p |(1 + λ)2 −2(2λ2 + 4λ + 1)t2| and |a3| ≤ t2 (1…
Corollary 2.4. Let f given by (1.1) be in the class RΣ(λ, 0, Φ(z, t)). Then |a2| ≤ t √ 2t p |(1 + λ)2 −2(2λ2 + 4λ + 1)t2| and |a3| ≤ t2 (1 + λ)2 + t 3(1 + 2λ) where 0 ≤λ ≤1 and t ̸= √1+λ
Theorem 3.1. Theorem 3.1. Let f given by (1.1) be in the class RΣ(λ, α, Φ(z, t)) and µ ∈R. Then we have |a3 −µa2 2| ≤           
Theorem 3.1. Let f given by (1.1) be in the class RΣ(λ, α, Φ(z, t)) and µ ∈R. Then we have |a3 −µa2 2| ≤           
Corollary 3.2. Corollary 3.2. If f ∈RΣ(λ, α, Φ(z, t)), then |a3 −a2 2| ≤ t (1 + 2λ)Ψ3(α). (3.3)
Corollary 3.2. If f ∈RΣ(λ, α, Φ(z, t)) , then |a3 −a2 2| ≤ t (1 + 2λ)Ψ3(α). (3.3)
Corollary 3.3. Corollary 3.3. Let f given by (1.1) be in the class S∗ Σ(α, Φ(z, t)) and µ ∈R. Then we have |a3 −µa2 2| ≤        t Ψ3(α), |µ −1| ≤
Corollary 3.3. Let f given by (1.1) be in the class S∗ Σ(α, Φ(z, t)) and µ ∈R. Then we have |a3 −µa2 2| ≤        t Ψ3(α), |µ −1| ≤
Corollary 3.4. Corollary 3.4. Let f given by (1.1) be in the class K∗ Σ(α, Φ(z, t)) and µ ∈R. Then we have |a3 −µa2 2| ≤        t 3Ψ3(α), |µ −1| ≤
Corollary 3.4. Let f given by (1.1) be in the class K∗ Σ(α, Φ(z, t)) and µ ∈R. Then we have |a3 −µa2 2| ≤        t 3Ψ3(α), |µ −1| ≤
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Geometric Properties of Analytic Functions Defined by the Miller–Ross-Type Poiss
2026
Texture enhancement of skin lesion images via Hankel determinants of $\lambda$-g
2026
Stud. Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai Math. 71(2026), No. 2, 235–252
2026
Coefficient Estimates and Distortion Bounds for Rabotnov Functions with Applicat
2026
On some properties of bi-univalent functions in the unit disc
2026
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #5,181 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback