🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

biology fractional dynamics
Abstract

In this paper our aim is to find the radii of starlikeness and convexity of the generalized Mittag-Leffler function for three different kinds of normalization by using their Hadamard factorization in such a way that the resulting functions are analytic in the unit disk of the complex plane. The characterization of entire functions from Laguerre-Pólya class and a result of H. Kumar and M.A. Pathan on the reality of the zeros of generalized Mittag-Leffler functions, which origins goes back to Dzhr

Results & Lemmas (6)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1. Lemma 1. If 1 α, β  ∈Wi and γ > 0, then the function z 7→φ(α, β, γ, −z2) has infinitely many zeros which are all real. Denoting by…
Lemma 1. If 1 α, β  ∈Wi and γ > 0, then the function z 7→φ(α, β, γ, −z2) has infinitely many zeros which are all real. Denoting by λα,β,γ,n the nth positive zero of z 7→φ(α, β, γ, −z2), under the same conditions the Weierstrassian decomposition φ(α, β, γ, −z2) = 1 Γ(β) Y n≥1
Theorem 1. · radius Theorem 1. Let 1 α, β  ∈Wi, γ > 0 and ρ ∈[0, 1). a. The radius of starlikeness of order ρ of fα,β,γ is r∗ ρ(fα,β,γ) = xα,β,γ,1, where…
Theorem 1. Let 1 α, β  ∈Wi, γ > 0 and ρ ∈[0, 1). a. The radius of starlikeness of order ρ of fα,β,γ is r∗ ρ(fα,β,γ) = xα,β,γ,1, where xα,β,γ,1 is the smallest positive zero of the transcendental equation rλ′(α, β, γ, r) −β(ρ −1)λ(α, β, γ, r) = 0. b. The radius of starlikeness of order ρ of gα,β,γ is r∗ ρ(gα,β,γ) = yα,β,γ,1, where yα,β,γ,1 is the smallest positive zero of the transcendental equation rλ′(α, β, γ, r) −(ρ −1)λ(α, β, γ, r) = 0. c. The radius of starlikeness of order ρ of hα,β,γ is
Theorem 2. · radius Theorem 2. Let 1 α, β  ∈Wi and γ > 0. a. The radius of starlikeness r∗(fα,β,γ) satisfies the inequalities γ(β + 2)Γ(β) βΓ(α + β) −(γ +…
Theorem 2. Let 1 α, β  ∈Wi and γ > 0. a. The radius of starlikeness r∗(fα,β,γ) satisfies the inequalities γ(β + 2)Γ(β) βΓ(α + β) −(γ + 1)(β + 4)Γ(α + β) (β + 2)Γ(2α + β) < (r∗(fα,β,γ))−2 < γ(β + 2)Γ(β) βΓ(α + β) . b. The radius of starlikeness r∗(gα,β,γ) satisfies the inequalities 3γΓ(β) Γ(α + β) −5(γ + 1)Γ(α + β)
Theorem 3. · radius Theorem 3. Let 1 α, β  ∈Wi, γ > 0 and ρ ∈[0, 1). a. The radius of convexity rc ρ(fα,β,γ) is the smallest positive root of the…
Theorem 3. Let 1 α, β  ∈Wi, γ > 0 and ρ ∈[0, 1). a. The radius of convexity rc ρ(fα,β,γ) is the smallest positive root of the transcendental equation (rfα,β,γ(r))′ = ρf ′ α,β,γ(r). b. The radius of convexity rc ρ(gα,β,γ) is the smallest positive root of the transcendental equation (rgα,β,γ(r))′ = ρg′ α,β,γ(r). c. The radius of convexity rc ρ(hα,β,γ) is the smallest positive root of the transcendental equation
Theorem 4. · radius Theorem 4. Let 1 α, β  ∈Wi and γ > 0. a. The radius of convexity rc(gα,β,γ) satisfies the inequalities 9γΓ(β) Γ(α + β) −25(γ + 1)Γ(α + β)…
Theorem 4. Let 1 α, β  ∈Wi and γ > 0. a. The radius of convexity rc(gα,β,γ) satisfies the inequalities 9γΓ(β) Γ(α + β) −25(γ + 1)Γ(α + β) 9Γ(2α + β) < (rc(gα,β,γ))−2 < 9γΓ(β) Γ(α + β). b. The radius of convexity rc(hα,β,γ) satisfies the inequalities 4γΓ(β) Γ(α + β) −9(γ + 1)Γ(α + β)
Lemma 1 Repeated OCR label — verify against source Lemma 1 they are interlaced with the zeros of z 7→Ψ(α, β, γ, z). Thus, Ψ′(α, β, γ, z) can be written as (2.6) Ψ′(α, β, γ, z) = β Γ(β)zβ−1 Y…
Lemma 1 they are interlaced with the zeros of z 7→Ψ(α, β, γ, z). Thus, Ψ′(α, β, γ, z) can be written as (2.6) Ψ′(α, β, γ, z) = β Γ(β)zβ−1 Y n≥1
Function classes studied:

Registry evidence (50)

Family memberships and relations in the registry that this paper supports.

Mittag-Leffler E_α
Mittag-Leffler E_α
Mittag-Leffler E_α
Normalized Bessel J_ν
Modified Bessel I_ν
Mittag-Leffler E_α
Struve H_ν (normalized)
Lommel s_{μ,ν}(z) normalized (ν=1/
Normalized Bessel J_ν
Modified Bessel I_ν
Struve H_ν (normalized)
Lommel s_{μ,ν}(z) normalized (ν=1/
Normalized Bessel J_ν
Modified Bessel I_ν
Struve H_ν (normalized)
Lommel s_{μ,ν}(z) normalized (ν=1/
Normalized Bessel J_ν
Modified Bessel I_ν
Mittag-Leffler E_α
Normalized Bessel J_ν
Modified Bessel I_ν
Wright φ(α,β; z)
Struve H_ν (normalized)
Lommel s_{μ,ν}(z) normalized (ν=1/
Normalized Bessel J_ν
Modified Bessel I_ν
Wright φ(α,β; z)
Struve H_ν (normalized)
Lommel s_{μ,ν}(z) normalized (ν=1/
Normalized Bessel J_ν
Modified Bessel I_ν
Wright φ(α,β; z)
Struve H_ν (normalized)
Lommel s_{μ,ν}(z) normalized (ν=1/
Normalized Bessel J_ν
Modified Bessel I_ν
Wright φ(α,β; z)
Struve H_ν (normalized)
Lommel s_{μ,ν}(z) normalized (ν=1/
Normalized Bessel J_ν
Modified Bessel I_ν
Wright φ(α,β; z)
Struve H_ν (normalized)
Lommel s_{μ,ν}(z) normalized (ν=1/
Mittag-Leffler E_α
Mittag-Leffler E_α
Mittag-Leffler E_α
Mittag-Leffler E_α
Normalized Bessel J_ν
Modified Bessel I_ν

Related Papers

Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Higher Dimensions
2026
Generalized Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Several Complex Variable
2026
On the logarithmic coefficients of Ma-Minda type convex functions
2026
Logarithmic Coefficients Problems of Geometric Subclass of Closed-to-convex Func
2026
The sharp refined Bohr inequalities for a subclass of close-to-convex harmonic m
2026
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 279 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback