🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

cryptography
Abstract

In this present investigation, we introduce the new class R of bi-univalent functions defined by using the Tremblay fractional derivative operator. Additionally, we use the Faber polynomial expansions and Fibonacci numbers to derive bounds for the general coefficient an of the bi-univalent function class.

Results & Lemmas (6)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 7 Theorem 7 For γ ∈C 0, let f ∈Rµ,ρ Σ,γ ep . If am = 0 (2 ≤m ≤n −1), then |an| ≤|γ| |τ| Γ(µ + 1)Γ(n + ρ) nΓ(ρ + 1)Γ(n + µ) (n ≥3).
Theorem 7 For γ ∈C\{0}, let f ∈Rµ,ρ Σ,γ ep  . If am = 0 (2 ≤m ≤n −1), then |an| ≤|γ| |τ| Γ(µ + 1)Γ(n + ρ) nΓ(ρ + 1)Γ(n + µ) (n ≥3).
Corollary 8 Corollary 8 For γ ∈C 0, suppose that f ∈RΣ,γ ep . If am = 0 (2 ≤m ≤n −1), then |an| ≤|γ| |τ| n (n ≥3).
Corollary 8 For γ ∈C\{0}, suppose that f ∈RΣ,γ ep  . If am = 0 (2 ≤m ≤n −1), then |an| ≤|γ| |τ| n (n ≥3).
Corollary 9 Corollary 9 Suppose that f ∈RΣ ep . If am = 0 (2 ≤m ≤n −1), then |an| ≤|τ| n (n ≥3).
Corollary 9 Suppose that f ∈RΣ ep  . If am = 0 (2 ≤m ≤n −1), then |an| ≤|τ| n (n ≥3).
Theorem 10 Theorem 10 Let f ∈Rµ,ρ Σ,γ ep  (γ ∈C 0 ).Then |a2| ≤ min       
Theorem 10 Let f ∈Rµ,ρ Σ,γ ep  (γ ∈C\{0}).Then |a2| ≤ min       
Corollary 11 Corollary 11 Let f ∈RΣ,γ ep  (γ ∈C 0 ).Then |a2| ≤min ( |γ| |τ| p 3 |γ −4| |τ| + 4, |τ| p |γ| ) and |a3| ≤min
Corollary 11 Let f ∈RΣ,γ ep  (γ ∈C\{0}).Then |a2| ≤min ( |γ| |τ| p 3 |γ −4| |τ| + 4 , |τ| p |γ| ) and |a3| ≤min
Corollary 12 Corollary 12 Let f ∈RΣ ep .Then |a2| ≤ |τ| p 9 |τ| + 4 and |a3| ≤ 4 |τ|2 9 |τ| + 4. References [1] Airault H. Symmetric sums associated…
Corollary 12 Let f ∈RΣ ep  .Then |a2| ≤ |τ| p 9 |τ| + 4 and |a3| ≤ 4 |τ|2 9 |τ| + 4. References [1] Airault H. Symmetric sums associated to the factorization of Grunsky coef- ficients. In: Conference, Groups and Symmetries, Montreal, Canada, 2007.
Function classes studied:

Registry evidence (4)

Family memberships and relations in the registry that this paper supports.

₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome
₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome

Related Papers

On some properties of bi-univalent functions in the unit disc
2026
Coefficient Estimates and Distortion Bounds for Rabotnov Functions with Applicat
2026
Properties of some univalent functions associated with balloon-shaped domain
2026
Texture enhancement of skin lesion images via Hankel determinants of $\lambda$-g
2026
Geometric Properties of Analytic Functions Defined by the Miller–Ross-Type Poiss
2026
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 279 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback