🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Abstract

Let $\mathcal{S}^*(α_1,α_2)$, where $ α_1, α_2 \in (0,1]$, represent the class of functions $f$ that are analytic in the open unit disk $\mathbb{D}$, normalized by $f(0) = f'(0) - 1=0$, and satisfying the following double-sided inequality: \begin{equation*} -\frac{πα_1}{2}< \arg\left\{\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right\} <\frac{πα_2}{2}, \quad (z\in\mathbb{D}). \end{equation*} In this manuscript, we estimate the coefficients and logarithmic coefficients associated with functions that belong to the clas

Results & Lemmas (19)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 2.1. Lemma 2.1. [1, Lemma 2.1] For n ∈N, let Bn(α1, α2, c) be defined by (2.6). Then for |α1+α2| < 2, we have |Bn(α1, α2, c)| ≤|Bn(α1, α2, 1)|.…
Lemma 2.1. [1, Lemma 2.1] For n ∈N, let Bn(α1, α2, c) be defined by (2.6). Then for |α1+α2| < 2, we have |Bn(α1, α2, c)| ≤|Bn(α1, α2, 1)|. As a result of Lemma 2.1, we get the following:
Corollary 2.1. Corollary 2.1. Let An be defined as in (2.4) for n = 1, 2, 3,..., and |α1 + α2| < 2 for α1, α2 ∈ (0, 1]. Then |An| ≤λ |Bn(α1, α2, 1)|,…
Corollary 2.1. Let An be defined as in (2.4) for n = 1, 2, 3, . . ., and |α1 + α2| < 2 for α1, α2 ∈ (0, 1]. Then |An| ≤λ |Bn(α1, α2, 1)|, where (2.7) λ = (α1 + α2) cos πθ 2  with θ = α2 −α1 α2 + α1 . The main purpose of this paper is to study the class S∗(α1, α,2 ), which is provided below:
Lemma 2.2. Lemma 2.2. (See [17]) Let λ and γ be complex numbers with λ ̸= 0 and let q be convex univalent in D with Re λq(z) + γ ≥0. If p is analytic…
Lemma 2.2. (See [17]) Let λ and γ be complex numbers with λ ̸= 0 and let q be convex univalent in D with Re{λq(z) + γ} ≥0. If p is analytic in D with p(0) = q(0), then p(z) + zp′(z) λp(z) + γ ≺q(z) ⇒p(z) ≺q(z).
Lemma 2.3. Lemma 2.3. (See [28]) Let F, H ∈H be any convex univalent functions in D. If f ≺F and g ≺H, then (2.10) f(z) ∗g(z) ≺F(z) ∗H(z), where “*”…
Lemma 2.3. (See [28]) Let F, H ∈H be any convex univalent functions in D. If f ≺F and g ≺H, then (2.10) f(z) ∗g(z) ≺F(z) ∗H(z), where “*” denotes the well-known Hadamard product. In the following, we recall some other useful lemmas.
Lemma 2.4 Lemma 2.4 (See [25]). Let q(z) = P∞ n=1 Qnzn be analytic and univalent in D, and suppose that q maps D onto a convex domain. If p(z) = P∞…
Lemma 2.4 (See [25]). Let q(z) = P∞ n=1 Qnzn be analytic and univalent in D, and suppose that q maps D onto a convex domain. If p(z) = P∞ n=1 Pnzn is analytic in D and satisfies the following subordination: p(z) ≺q(z), then |Pn| ≤|Q1|, (n = 1, 2, 3, . . .).
Lemma 2.5. Lemma 2.5. [2, Lemma 1] If w(z) = P∞ k=1 wkzk is a Schwarz function, then |w2 −tw2 1| ≤           
Lemma 2.5. [2, Lemma 1] If w(z) = P∞ k=1 wkzk is a Schwarz function, then |w2 −tw2 1| ≤           
Lemma 2.6. Lemma 2.6. (See [19]) If w(z) = P∞ n=1 wnzn is a Schwarz function, then for any complex numbers ρ and τ the following sharp estimate holds:…
Lemma 2.6. (See [19]) If w(z) = P∞ n=1 wnzn is a Schwarz function, then for any complex numbers ρ and τ the following sharp estimate holds: |w3 + ρw1w2 + τw3 1| ≤H(ρ, τ),
Lemma 2.7. Lemma 2.7. If the function f ∈S satisfies the following subordination, 1 + zf ′′(z) f ′(z) ≺G(z), then f belongs to the class S∗(α1, α2),…
Lemma 2.7. If the function f ∈S satisfies the following subordination, 1 + zf ′′(z) f ′(z) ≺G(z), then f belongs to the class S∗(α1, α2), where G is given by (2.2).
Lemma 2.2. · coeff Lemma 2.2. □ 3. Main Results Determining the sharp coefficient bounds for strongly starlike functions appears to pose a challenging…
Lemma 2.2. □ 3. Main Results Determining the sharp coefficient bounds for strongly starlike functions appears to pose a challenging classical problem. To date, the estimation of the coefficients of these functions remains an open problem. There are several known results for specific subclasses of strongly starlike functions, but there is no general solution for the entire class. One of the main challenges in this problem is that the definition of strongly starlike functions is quite broad, and t
Theorem 3.1. Theorem 3.1. Let the function f ∈A belong to the class SS∗(β), where β ∈(0, 1]. Then the following sharp inequalities hold: |a2| ≤2β, |a3|…
Theorem 3.1. Let the function f ∈A belong to the class SS∗(β), where β ∈(0, 1]. Then the following sharp inequalities hold: |a2| ≤2β, |a3| ≤    β, 0 < β ≤1/3; 3β2, 1/3 ≤β ≤1, and |a4| ≤  
Theorem 3.2. Theorem 3.2. Let f be of the form (2.1) belonging to the class S∗(α1, α2), where 0 < α1, α2 ≤1. Then |a2| ≤λ and for n ≥3, (3.1) |an| ≤ λ n…
Theorem 3.2. Let f be of the form (2.1) belonging to the class S∗(α1, α2), where 0 < α1, α2 ≤1. Then |a2| ≤λ and for n ≥3, (3.1) |an| ≤ λ n −1 n−1 Y k=2  1 + λ k −1  ,
Theorem 3.3. Theorem 3.3. If the function f of the form (2.1) is a strongly starlike function of order β, then |an| ≤      2β, n = 2; 2β n−1 Qn−1…
Theorem 3.3. If the function f of the form (2.1) is a strongly starlike function of order β, then |an| ≤      2β, n = 2; 2β n−1 Qn−1 k=2  1 +
Theorem 3.4. Theorem 3.4. Consider a function f ∈A, which takes the form (2.1) and belongs to the class S∗(α1, α2), where α1, α2 ∈(0, 1]. Let λ be…
Theorem 3.4. Consider a function f ∈A, which takes the form (2.1) and belongs to the class S∗(α1, α2), where α1, α2 ∈(0, 1]. Let λ be defined by (2.7), and γ = (3α−1)/2, where α is given by (2.3). Then |a2| ≤λ, |a3| ≤      λ 2 , 0 < α ≤1/3; λ 2
Theorem 3.5. Theorem 3.5. If the function f ∈A belongs to the class S∗(α1, α2), then (3.14) log f(z) z  ≺ Z z 0 G(t) −1 t dt, where the function G is…
Theorem 3.5. If the function f ∈A belongs to the class S∗(α1, α2), then (3.14) log f(z) z  ≺ Z z 0 G(t) −1 t dt, where the function G is defined by (2.2). Moreover, (3.15) eG(z) :=
Theorem 3.6. Theorem 3.6. Let eG be of the form (3.15) and 0 < α1, α2 ≤1. If f(z) ∈S∗(α1, α2), then r exp eG(−r) ≤|f(z)| ≤r exp eG(r), for each r = |z|…
Theorem 3.6. Let eG be of the form (3.15) and 0 < α1, α2 ≤1. If f(z) ∈S∗(α1, α2), then r exp eG(−r) ≤|f(z)| ≤r exp eG(r), for each r = |z| < 1. Both inequalities are sharp.
Theorem 3.7. · coeff Theorem 3.7. Let f ∈S∗(α1, α2) and the coefficients of log(f(z)/z) be given by (3.13) and 0 < α1, α2 ≤1. Then (3.19) |γn| ≤λ 2n, (n ≥1),…
Theorem 3.7. Let f ∈S∗(α1, α2) and the coefficients of log(f(z)/z) be given by (3.13) and 0 < α1, α2 ≤1. Then (3.19) |γn| ≤λ 2n, (n ≥1), where λ is given by (2.7). The result is sharp.
Corollary 3.1. · coeff Corollary 3.1. Let f be a strongly starlike function of order β, where 0 < β ≤1. Then the logarithmic coefficients of f satisfy the…
Corollary 3.1. Let f be a strongly starlike function of order β, where 0 < β ≤1. Then the logarithmic coefficients of f satisfy the following sharp inequality: |γn| ≤1 nβ, (n ≥1). In particular, taking β = 1 gives us an estimate of the logarithmic coefficients of starlike func- tions.
Theorem 3.8. Theorem 3.8. Suppose that f belongs to the class A. If f ∈S∗(α1, α2), then Re zf ′(z) f(z)  ≥ 1 −(1 + 2 cos(πθ/2)) r 1 −r (α1+α2)/2, 0…
Theorem 3.8. Suppose that f belongs to the class A. If f ∈S∗(α1, α2), then Re zf ′(z) f(z)  ≥ 1 −(1 + 2 cos(πθ/2)) r 1 −r (α1+α2)/2 , 0 ≤|z| = r ≤ 1 1 + 2 cos(πθ/2), and Re
Corollary 3.2. Corollary 3.2. Let f be a strongly starlike function of order β, where 0 < β ≤1. Then 1 −3r 1 −r β ≤Re zf ′(z) f(z)  ≤ 1 + r 1 −r β,…
Corollary 3.2. Let f be a strongly starlike function of order β, where 0 < β ≤1. Then 1 −3r 1 −r β ≤Re zf ′(z) f(z)  ≤ 1 + r 1 −r β , (|z| = r ≤1/3). In particular, if f is a strongly starlike function of order β, and |z| = 1/3, then

Definitions (1)

Def 2.1. Definition 2.1. Let 0 < α1, α2 ≤1. A function f ∈S belongs to the class S∗(α1, α2), if f satisfies the following two-sided inequality (2.8)…
Definition 2.1. Let 0 < α1, α2 ≤1. A function f ∈S belongs to the class S∗(α1, α2), if f satisfies the following two-sided inequality (2.8) −πα1 2 < arg zf ′(z) f(z)  < πα2

Related Papers

Notes on the norm of pre-Schwarzian derivatives on bi-univalent functions of ord
2019
Some new inequalities for univalent functions
2018
Some applications of differential subordination for certain starlike functions
2018
Some inequalities for a certain subclass of starlike functions
2018
Further results for starlike functions related with Booth lemniscate
2018
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #4,835 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback