Continue from this paper
Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.
Abstract
In 2011, Sokół (Comput. Math. Appl. 62, 611--619) introduced and studied the class $\mathcal{SK}(α)$ as a certain subclass of starlike functions, consists of all functions $f$ ($f(0)=0=f'(0)-1$) which satisfy in the following subordination relation: \begin{equation*} \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\prec \frac{3}{3+(α-3)z-αz^2} \qquad |z|<1, \end{equation*} where $-3<α\leq1$. Also, he obtained some interesting results for the class $\mathcal{SK}(α)$. In this paper, some another properties of this class, incl
Results & Lemmas (14)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Lemma 1.1
Lemma 1.1. [10, p.35] Let be a set in the complex plane and let b be a complex number such that Re(b) > 0. Suppose that a function…
Lemma 1.1. [10, p.35] Let $\Xi$ be a set in the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$ and let b be a complex number such that Re(b) > 0. Suppose that a function $\psi : \mathbb{C}^2 \times \Delta \to \mathbb{C}$ satisfies the condition:
$$\psi(i\rho,\sigma;z) \notin \Xi$$
,
for all real $\rho, \sigma \leq -|b-i\rho|^2$ /(2Reb) and all $z \in \Delta$ . If the function p(z) defined by $p(z) = b + b_1 z + b_2 z^2 + \cdots$ is analytic in $\Delta$ and if
$$\psi(p(z), zp'(z); z) \in \Xi,$$
then $\operatorname{Re}(p(z)) > 0$ in $\Delta$ .
Lemma 1.2 · coeff
Lemma 1.2. [9] Let the function g(z) given by be in the class. Then, for any complex number The result is sharp. The structure of the paper…
Lemma 1.2. [9] Let the function g(z) given by
$$q(z) = 1 + c_1 z + c_2 z^2 + \cdots$$
be in the class $\mathcal{P}$ . Then, for any complex number $\mu$
$$|c_2 - \mu c_1^2| \le 2 \max\{1, |2\mu - 1|\}.$$
The result is sharp.
The structure of the paper is the following. In Section 2, at first, we obtain a lower bound for the $\operatorname{Re} \frac{f(z)}{z}$ and by using it we get $\mathcal{S}^* \subset \mathcal{Q}(1/2)$ . In the sequel, we obtain the order of strongly starlikeness for the functions which belong to the class $\mathcal{SK}(\alpha)$ . In Section 3, sharp coefficient logarithmic inequality and sharp Fekete-Szegö inequality are obtained.
Theorem 2.1
Theorem 2.1. Let be in the class and. Then (2.1) That is means that.
Theorem 2.1. Let $f \in A$ be in the class $SK(\alpha)$ and $0 \le \alpha \le 1$ . Then
(2.1)
$$\operatorname{Re}\left(\frac{f(z)}{z}\right) > \gamma(\alpha) := \frac{2\alpha^2 + 3\alpha + 9}{3(\alpha^2 + 3\alpha + 6)} \qquad (z \in \Delta).$$
That is means that $SK(\alpha) \subset Q(\gamma(\alpha))$ .
Corollary 2.1
Corollary 2.1. Let be defined by (1.1). Then, i.e. We remark that in [4, 6], the authors with a different method have shown that. By…
Corollary 2.1. Let $f \in A$ be defined by (1.1). Then $S^* \subset \mathcal{Q}(1/2)$ , i.e.
$$\operatorname{Re}\left(\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right) > 0 \Rightarrow \operatorname{Re}\left(\frac{f(z)}{z}\right) > \frac{1}{2} \qquad (z \in \Delta).$$
We remark that in [4, 6], the authors with a different method have shown that $S^* \subset \mathcal{Q}(1/2)$ .
By putting $z = re^{i\varphi}(r < 1), \varphi \in [0, 2\pi)$ and with a simple calculation, we have
$$\begin{split} \widetilde{q}_{\alpha}(re^{i\varphi}) &= \frac{3}{3 + (\alpha - 3)re^{i\varphi} - \alpha r^2 e^{2i\varphi}} \\ &= \frac{9 + 3(\alpha - 3)r\cos\varphi - 3\alpha r^2\cos2\varphi - 3i[(\alpha - 3)r\sin\varphi - \alpha r^2\sin2\varphi]}{9 + (\alpha - 3)^2r^2 + \alpha^2r^4 + 2r(\alpha - 3)(3 - \alpha r^2)\cos\varphi - 6\alpha r^2\cos2\varphi}. \end{split}$$
Hence
$$\left| \frac{\operatorname{Im}\{\widetilde{q}_{\alpha}(re^{i\varphi})\}}{\operatorname{Re}\{\widetilde{q}_{\alpha}(re^{i\varphi})\}} \right| = \left| \frac{3[(\alpha - 3)r\sin\varphi - \alpha r^{2}\sin2\varphi]}{9 + 3(\alpha - 3)r\cos\varphi - 3\alpha r^{2}\cos2\varphi} \right|
(2.5)
$$< \frac{3(3 - \alpha)r + |\alpha|r^{2}}{9 - 3(3 - \alpha)r - 3|\alpha|r^{2}} =: \phi(r) \qquad (r < 1, \quad -3 < \alpha \le 1).$$$$
For such r the curve $\widetilde{q}_{\alpha}(re^{i\varphi})$ , $\varphi \in [0, 2\pi)$ , has no loops and $\widetilde{q}_{\alpha}(re^{i\varphi})$ is univalent in $\Delta_r = \{z : |z| < r\}$ . Therefore
(2.6)
$$\left[ \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \prec \widetilde{q}_{\alpha}(z), \quad z \in \Delta_r \right] \Leftrightarrow \left[ \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \in \widetilde{q}_{\alpha}(\Delta_r), \quad z \in \Delta_r \right].$$
The above relations give the following theorem.
Theorem 2.2
Theorem 2.2. Let. If, then f is strongly starlike of order in the unit disc.
Theorem 2.2. Let $-1 < \alpha \le 1$ . If $f \in \mathcal{SK}(\alpha)$ , then f is strongly starlike of order
$$\frac{2}{\pi}\arctan\left\{\frac{3(3-\alpha)+|\alpha|}{9-3(3-\alpha)-3|\alpha|}\right\},\,$$
in the unit disc $\Delta$ .
Theorem 3.1
Theorem 3.1. Let and. If, then there exists a function such that (3.2)
Theorem 3.1. Let $f \in \mathcal{A}$ and $-3 < \alpha \leq 1$ . If $f \in \mathcal{SK}(\alpha)$ , then there exists a function $w(z) \in \mathfrak{B}$ such that
(3.2)
$$\log \frac{f(z)}{z} = \int_0^z \frac{\widetilde{q}_{\alpha}(w(t)) - 1}{t} dt \qquad (z \in \Delta).$$
Corollary 3.1
Corollary 3.1. Let and. If, then (3.3) The celebrated de Branges' inequalities (the former Milin conjecture) for univalent functions f…
Corollary 3.1. Let $f \in A$ and $-3 < \alpha < 1$ . If $f \in SK(\alpha)$ , then
(3.3)
$$\log \frac{f(z)}{z} \prec \int_0^z \frac{\widetilde{q}_{\alpha}(t) - 1}{t} dt \qquad (z \in \Delta).$$
The celebrated de Branges' inequalities (the former Milin conjecture) for univalent functions f state that
$$\sum_{n=1}^{k} (k-n+1)|\gamma_n|^2 \le \sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{k+1-n}{n} \qquad (k=1,2,\ldots),$$
with equality if and only if $f(z) = e^{-i\theta}k(e^{i\theta}z)$ (see [1]). De Branges [1] used this inequality to prove the celebrated Bieberbach conjecture. Moreover, the de Branges' inequalities have also been the source of many other interesting inequalities involving logarithmic coefficients of $f \in \mathcal{S}$ such as (see [3])
$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} |\gamma_n|^2 \le \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}.$$
Now, we have the following
Theorem 3.2
Theorem 3.2. Let belongs to the class and. Then the logarithmic coefficients of f satisfy in the inequality (3.4) where Li<sub>2</sub> is…
Theorem 3.2. Let $f \in \mathcal{A}$ belongs to the class $\mathcal{SK}(\alpha)$ and $-3 < \alpha \leq 1$ . Then the logarithmic coefficients of f satisfy in the inequality
(3.4)
$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} |\gamma_n|^2 \le \frac{1}{4(3+\alpha)^2} \left[ \frac{3\pi^2}{2} + 6\alpha Li_2(-\alpha/3) + \alpha^2 Li_2(\alpha^2/9) \right],$$
where Li<sub>2</sub> is defined as following
(3.5)
$$Li_2(z) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{z^n}{n^2} = \int_z^0 \frac{\ln(1-t)}{t} dt.$$
The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 3.3
Theorem 3.3. Let be a member of. Then the logarithmic coefficients of f satisfy
Theorem 3.3. Let $f \in A$ be a member of $SK(\alpha)$ . Then the logarithmic coefficients of f satisfy
$$|\gamma_n| \le \frac{3-\alpha}{6n}$$
$(-3 < \alpha \le 1, n \ge 1).$
Theorem 3.4
Theorem 3.4. Let that, and F is the kth root transform of f defined by (3.9). Then, for any complex number, The result is sharp.
Theorem 3.4. Let that $f \in \mathcal{SK}(\alpha)$ , $-3 < \alpha \le 1$ and F is the kth root transform of f defined by (3.9). Then, for any complex number $\mu$ ,
$$(3.10) \qquad \left| b_{2k+1} - \mu b_{k+1}^2 \right| \le \frac{3-\alpha}{6k} \max \left\{ 1, \left| \frac{2\mu - 1}{k} \left( 1 - \frac{\alpha}{3} \right) - \frac{\alpha^2 - 3\alpha + 9}{6(3-\alpha)} \right| \right\}.$$
The result is sharp.
Corollary 3.2 · coeff
Corollary 3.2. (Fekete-Szegö inequality) Suppose that. Then, for any complex number, The result is sharp. If we take k = 1 and in Theorem…
Corollary 3.2. (Fekete-Szegö inequality) Suppose that $f \in \mathcal{SK}(\alpha)$ . Then, for any complex number $\mu$ ,
$$(3.20) \left| a_3 - \mu a_2^2 \right| \le \frac{3 - \alpha}{6} \max \left\{ 1, \left| (2\mu - 1)(1 - \alpha/3) - \frac{\alpha^2 - 3\alpha + 9}{6(3 - \alpha)} \right| \right\}.$$
The result is sharp.
If we take k = 1 and $\alpha = -1$ in Theorem 3.4, we get:
Corollary 3.3 · coeff
Corollary 3.3. Let f given by the form (1.1) be starlike function. Then The result is sharp. Taking k = 1 and in Theorem 3.4, we have:
Corollary 3.3. Let f given by the form (1.1) be starlike function. Then
$$(3.21) |a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \max\{2/3, |8(2\mu - 1)/9 - 7/12|\}.$$
The result is sharp.
Taking k = 1 and $\alpha = 0$ in Theorem 3.4, we have:
Corollary 3.4 · coeff
Corollary 3.4. Let f given by the form (1.1) be in the class. Then The result is sharp. It is well known that every function has an…
Corollary 3.4. Let f given by the form (1.1) be in the class $S^*(1/2)$ . Then
$$\left| a_3 - \mu a_2^2 \right| \le \frac{1}{2} \max \left\{ 1, \left| 2\mu - 3/2 \right| \right\}.$$
The result is sharp.
It is well known that every function $f \in \mathcal{S}$ has an inverse $f^{-1}$ , defined by $f^{-1}(f(z)) = z, z \in \Delta$ and
$$f(f^{-1}(w)) = w$$
$(|w| < r_0; r_0 > 1/4),$
where
$$(3.23) f^{-1}(w) = w - a_2 w^2 + (2a_2^2 - a_3)w^3 - (5a_2^3 - 5a_2a_3 + a_4)w^4 + \cdots$$
Corollary 3.5
Corollary 3.5. Let the function f, given by (1.1), be in the class. Also let the function be inverse of f. Then
Corollary 3.5. Let the function f, given by (1.1), be in the class $\mathcal{SK}(\alpha)$ . Also let the function $f^{-1}(w) = w + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} b_n w^n$ be inverse of f. Then
$$(3.24) |b_3| \le \frac{3-\alpha}{6} \max\left\{1, \left| \frac{5\alpha^2 - 33\alpha + 45}{6(3-\alpha)} \right| \right\}.$$
Definitions (1)
Def 1.1
Definition 1.1. The function belongs to the class,, if it satisfies the condition (1.7) where is given by (1.4). Since Re > 9(1 + )/2(3 +…
Definition 1.1. The function $f \in \mathcal{A}$ belongs to the class $\mathcal{SK}(\alpha)$ , $\alpha \in (-3,1]$ , if it satisfies the condition
(1.7)
$$\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \prec \widetilde{q}_{\alpha}(z) \qquad (z \in \Delta),$$
where $\widetilde{q}_{\alpha}$ is given by (1.4).
Since Re $\{\widetilde{q}_{\alpha}(z)\}$ > 9(1 + $\alpha$ )/2(3 + $\alpha$ )<sup>2</sup>, therefore if $f \in \mathcal{SK}(\alpha)$ , then
(1.8)
$$\operatorname{Re}\left(\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right) > \frac{9(1+\alpha)}{2(3+\alpha)^2} \qquad (z \in \Delta).$$
This means that if $f \in \mathcal{SK}(\alpha)$ , then it is starlike of order $\gamma$ where $\gamma = 9(1+\alpha)/2(3+\alpha)^2$ . Also, $\mathcal{SK}(\alpha) \subset \mathcal{S}$ when $-1 \leq \alpha < 1$ , $\mathcal{SK}(0) \equiv \mathcal{S}^(1/2)$ , $\mathcal{SK}(1) \equiv \mathcal{S}^(9/16)$ and $\mathcal{SK}(-1) \equiv \mathcal{S}$ .
We denote by $\mathcal{P}$ the well-known class of analytic functions p(z) with p(0) = 1 and Re(p(z)) > 0, $z \in \Delta$ .
For the proof of our results, we need the following Lemmas.
Function classes studied:
Coefficient bounds & claims (6)
Machine-extracted from the paper text - useful for cross-referencing, not a verified fact.
coefficient_bound
Re{f(z)/z} ≤ (2*alpha**2+3*alpha+9)/(3*(alpha**2+3*alpha+6)) for class SK(alpha) [Theorem 2.1]
coefficient_bound
sum_{n=1}^inf |gamma_n|^2 ≤ 1/(4*(3+alpha)**2) * (3*pi**2/2 + 6*alpha*Li2(-alpha/3) + alpha**2*Li2(alpha**2/9)) for class SK(alpha) (sharp) [Theorem 3.2]
coefficient_bound
|gamma_n| ≤ (3-alpha)/(6*n) for class SK(alpha) [Theorem 3.3]
coefficient_bound
|b_{2k+1} - mu*b_{k+1}^2| (Fekete-Szego for kth root) ≤ (3-alpha)/(6*k) * max(1, |2*mu/k*(1-alpha/3) - (alpha**2-3*alpha+9)/(6*(3-alpha))|) for class SK(alpha) (sharp) [Theorem 3.4]
coefficient_bound
|a_3 - mu*a_2^2| (Fekete-Szego, k=1) ≤ (3-alpha)/6 * max(1, |(2*mu-1)*(1-alpha/3) - (alpha**2-3*alpha+9)/(6*(3-alpha))|) for class SK(alpha) (sharp) [Corollary 3.2]
function_family
Class SK(alpha): f in A: zf'/f subordinate to eq_alpha(z) = 3/(3+(alpha-3)*z-alpha*z^2), -3 < alpha <= 1
Related Papers