🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

A conjecture of Bombieri states that the coefficients of a normalized univalent function $f$ should satisfy $$ \liminf_{f\to K} \frac{n-{\rm Re\,}a_n}{m-{\rm Re\,}a_m} = \min_{t\in{\mathbb R}} \, \frac{n\sin t -\sin(nt)}{m\sin t -\sin(mt)}, $$ when $f$ approaches the Koebe function $K(z)=\frac{z}{(1-z)^2}$. Recently, Leung disproved this conjecture for $n=2$ and for all $m\geq3$ and, also, for $n=3$ and for all odd $m\geq5$. Complementing his work we disprove it for all $m>n\geq2$ which are simu

Results & Lemmas (8)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1. Theorem 1. Let m > n ≥2 be integers such that either (a) both m and n are odd, or (b) both m and n are even, or (c) m is odd, n is even and…
Theorem 1. Let m > n ≥2 be integers such that either (a) both m and n are odd, or (b) both m and n are even, or (c) m is odd, n is even and n ≤m+1 2 . Then (6) is true. We have already observed that one can deduce the following corollary. Corollary. Let m > n ≥2 be integers such that either (a), (b) or (c) in
Theorem 1 Repeated OCR label — verify against source Theorem 1 holds. Then Bombieri’s conjecture for this pair of integers is false.
Theorem 1 holds. Then Bombieri’s conjecture for this pair of integers is false.
Theorem 1 Repeated OCR label — verify against source Theorem 1 will be proved mainly with the use of trigonometry, but also, in the case when the hypothesis (c) holds, we will employ…
Theorem 1 will be proved mainly with the use of trigonometry, but also, in the case when the hypothesis (c) holds, we will employ Dieudonn´e’s criterion for univalent polynomials. After carefully examining the relevant graphs for 2 ≤n ≤80 using the www.desmos.com/calculator software, one is lead to believe that the hypothe- sis (c) in Theorem 1 can be notably weakened in that the point (m, n) has to be below the straight line that joins the points (7, 6) and (17, 14). Thus, the following proposi
Lemma 2 Lemma 2 (Dieudonn´e’s criterion). The polynomial p(z) = z + a2z2 +... + anzn is univalent in D if and only if its associated polynomials…
Lemma 2 (Dieudonn´e’s criterion). The polynomial p(z) = z + a2z2 + . . . + anzn is univalent in D if and only if its associated polynomials q(z; t) = 1 + a2 sin(2t) sin t z + . . . + an sin(nt) sin t zn−1 have no zeros in D for any choice of the parameter t ∈[0, π]. We now prove a simple lemma for An(t) = n −sin(nt) sin t , which we defined in (2).
Lemma 3. Lemma 3. For all t ∈R and n ≥2, we have An(t) ≥0 and An(2π −t) = An(t). Also, An vanishes only for t = 2ℓπ, ℓ∈Z, when n is even and only…
Lemma 3. For all t ∈R and n ≥2, we have An(t) ≥0 and An(2π −t) = An(t). Also, An vanishes only for t = 2ℓπ, ℓ∈Z, when n is even and only for t = ℓπ, ℓ∈Z, when n is odd.
Lemma 4. Lemma 4. For all integers n ≥2 and for all t ∈(0, π) it holds that An(t) n3 −n ≥ An+2(t) (n + 2)3 −(n + 2). (7)
Lemma 4. For all integers n ≥2 and for all t ∈(0, π) it holds that An(t) n3 −n ≥ An+2(t) (n + 2)3 −(n + 2). (7)
Lemma 3 Repeated OCR label — verify against source Lemma 3) we may restrict our attention to t in [0, π]. Suppose first that either the hypothesis (a) or (b) holds, that is, m and n are…
Lemma 3) we may restrict our attention to t in [0, π]. Suppose first that either the hypothesis (a) or (b) holds, that is, m and n are simultaneously odd or even. Note that ϕmn(0) = ϕmn(π) = n3 −n m3 −m for odd m, n and that ϕmn(0) = n3 −n m3 −m < n m = ϕmn(π) for even m, n. Hence, our goal is to show that An(t) Am(t) ≥n3 −n m3 −m
Theorem 1. Repeated OCR label — verify against source Theorem 1. 4. Appendix: Calculation of qn Here our starting point will be Bombieri’s formula (4.1) in [2]. According to it, if φ is a…
Theorem 1. 4. Appendix: Calculation of qn Here our starting point will be Bombieri’s formula (4.1) in [2]. According to it, if φ is a function in L2[0, 1] then a second variation of the Koebe function is given by q(z) = Q K(z)  , where Q(w) = −w2 Z 1 0 φ(u)2 U du −2w3 Z 1

Related Papers

Harmonic mappings, univalence criteria and a theorem of Lehtinen
2026
On Hardy spaces, univalent functions and the second coefficient
2025
Applications of Livingston-type inequalities to the generalized Zalcman function
2016
On the generalized Zalcman functional for some classes of univalent functions
2014
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 291 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback