🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to consider geometric properties such as starlikeness and convexity of the Cesáro partial sums of certain analytic functions in the open unit disk. By using the Cesáro partial sums, we improve some recent results including the radius of convexity. AMS Subject Classification: 30C45

Results & Lemmas (5)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1 · radius Theorem 1. The function satisfies (3) for Furthermore, for Proof Noting that it follows that for, we obtain Moreover, we also observe that…
Theorem 1. The function $S_k(z)$ satisfies $$\frac{1 - |a_k| r^{k-1}}{1 - \frac{|a_k|}{k} r^{k-1}} \le \Re\left(\frac{z S_k'(z)}{S_k(z)}\right) \le \frac{1 + |a_k| r^{k-1}}{1 + \frac{|a_k|}{k} r^{k-1}}$$ (3) for $$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{k}{|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$ Furthermore, $S_k(z) \in S^*(\alpha)$ for $$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{1-\alpha}{(1-\alpha/k)|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$ Proof Noting that $$\frac{zS_k'(z)}{S_k(z)} = k - \frac{(k-1)}{1 + \frac{a_k}{k}z^{k-1}},$$ it follows that for $\cos \theta \rightarrow 1$ , we obtain $$\Re\left(\frac{zS'_k(z)}{S_k(z)}\right) = k - (k-1)\frac{1 + \frac{|a_k|}{k}\cos\theta r^{k-1}}{1 + 2\frac{|a_k|}{k}r^{k-1}\cos\theta + (\frac{|a_k|}{k})^2 r^{2(k-1)}}$$ $$\leq \frac{1 + |a_k|r^{k-1}}{1 + \frac{|a_k|}{k}r^{k-1}}.$$ Moreover, we also observe that $$\Re\left(\frac{zS'_k(z)}{S_k(z)}\right) \ge \frac{1 - |a_k| r^{k-1}}{1 - \frac{|a_k|}{k} r^{k-1}}.$$ Now assume that $$\frac{1 - |a_k| r^{k-1}}{1 - \frac{|a_k|}{k} r^{k-1}} > \alpha$$ for $$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{1-\alpha}{(1-\alpha/k)|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$ This completes the proof. Remark 2 For example, the values $\alpha = 0.5$ , k = 2 and $|a_k| = 1$ imply the radius of starlikeness of $S_k(z)$ is r = 0.8164965..., and for the same values, the radius of starlikeness of the ordinary partial sums $f_k(z) = z + a_k z^k$ is r = 0.577350... (see [2]). Next, we derive the radius of convexity.
Theorem 3 · radius Theorem 3. The function satisfies for Furthermore, for Proof A computation gives Therefore, for, we obtain Moreover, we impose Now,…
Theorem 3. The function $S_k(z)$ satisfies $$\frac{1 - k|a_k|r^{k-1}}{1 - |a_k|r^{k-1}} \le \Re\left(1 + \frac{zS_k''(z)}{S_k'(z)}\right) \le \frac{1 + k|a_k|r^{k-1}}{1 + |a_k|r^{k-1}} \tag{4}$$ for $$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{1}{|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$ Furthermore, $S_k(z) \in C(\alpha)$ for $$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{1-\alpha}{(k-\alpha)|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$ Proof A computation gives $$1 + \frac{zS_k''(z)}{S_k'(z)} = k - \frac{(k-1)}{1 + a_k z^{k-1}}.$$ Therefore, for $\cos \theta \rightarrow 1$ , we obtain $$\Re\left(1+\frac{zS_k''(z)}{S_k'(z)}\right) = k - (k-1)\frac{1+|a_k|\cos\theta r^{k-1}}{1+2|a_k|r^{k-1}\cos\theta + |a_k|^2r^{2(k-1)}}$$ $$\leq \frac{1+k|a_k|r^{k-1}}{1+|a_k|r^{k-1}}.$$ Moreover, we impose $$\Re\left(1 + \frac{zS_k''(z)}{S_k'(z)}\right) \ge \frac{1 - k|a_k|r^{k-1}}{1 - |a_k|r^{k-1}}.$$ Now, consider that $$\frac{1 - k|a_k|r^{k-1}}{1 - |a_k|r^{k-1}} > \alpha$$ for $$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{1-\alpha}{(k-\alpha)|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$ This completes the proof. Remark 4 In view of Theorem 3, for example, the values $\alpha = 0.5$ , k = 2 and $|a_k| = 1$ pose the radius of convexity of $S_k(z)$ is r = 0.577350... and for the same values, the radius of convexity of the ordinary partial sums $f_k(z) = z + a_k z^k$ is r = 0.4082... (see [2]). Next, we assume special ordinary partial sums depending so that their coefficients satisfy the relation $|a_n| \le (\frac{k-n+1}{k})$ .
Theorem 5 Theorem 5. Assume the partial sum,. Then the function. Proof We consider such that This implies that that is, By letting, we define the…
Theorem 5. Assume the partial sum $$f_3(z) = z + \frac{k-1}{k}z^2 + \frac{k-2}{k}z^3$$ , $k \ge 2$ . Then the function $f_3(z) \in S^*(\frac{1}{2})$ . Proof We consider $\alpha$ such that $$\Re\left(\frac{zf_3'(z)}{f_3(z)}\right) = \Re\left(3 - \frac{2 + \frac{k-1}{k}z}{1 + \frac{k-1}{k}z + \frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right) > \alpha.$$ This implies that $$\Re\left(\frac{2+\frac{k-1}{k}z}{1+\frac{k-1}{k}z+\frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right) < 3-\alpha,$$ that is, $$\Re\left(\frac{1-\frac{k-1}{k}z^2}{1+\frac{k-1}{k}z+\frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right) = \frac{1-\frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2\cos^2\theta-1)}{1+\frac{k-1}{k}r\cos\theta+\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2\cos^2\theta-1)} < 2-\alpha.$$ By letting $t = \cos \theta$ , we define the function g(t) as follows: $$g(t) = \frac{1 - \frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)}{1 + \frac{k-1}{k}rt + \frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)}.$$ Logarithmic derivative of g(t) yields $$\begin{split} \frac{g'(t)}{g(t)} &= - \left\{ \frac{(4t\frac{k-1}{k}r^2)[1 + \frac{k-1}{k}rt + \frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)] + (\frac{k-1}{k}r + 4\frac{k-2}{k}r^2t)[1 - \frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)]}{[1 - \frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)][1 + \frac{k-1}{k}rt + \frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)]} \right\} \\ &:= - \left\{ \frac{h(t)}{[1 - \frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)][1 + \frac{k-1}{k}rt + \frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)]} \right\} \\ &= - \frac{At^2 + Bt + C}{[1 - \frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)][1 + \frac{k-1}{k}rt + \frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)]}, \end{split}$$ where $$A = 2r^{3} \left(\frac{k-1}{k}\right)^{2},$$ $$B = 4r^{2} \left[\frac{k-1}{k} + \frac{k-2}{k}\right],$$ $$C = \frac{k-1}{k} r \left[1 + \frac{k-1}{k} r^{2}\right].$$ Now, for all $k \ge 2$ and $r \to 1$ , the function h(t) has unique real negative zeros in the interval $(-\frac{1}{2},0)$ . This leads to the fact that g'(t) has unique positive real zeros for all $k \ge 2$ distributed in the interval $(0, \frac{1}{2})$ . Therefore, we will calculate $\alpha$ in $t \in [\frac{1}{2}, 1)$ . It is easy to check that g(t) is decreasing for $r \to 1$ in the interval $[\frac{1}{2}, 1)$ . Moreover, we have $$\lim_{k \to \infty} g\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = \lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{1 + \frac{k-1}{2k}}{1 + \frac{k-1}{2k} - \frac{k-2}{2k}} = \frac{3}{2}.$$ We conclude that for $t \in [\frac{1}{2}, 1)$ , $$g(t) < g\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) \le \frac{3}{2} = 2 - \alpha,$$ thus $\alpha = \frac{1}{2}$ . This completes the proof. By letting k = 3 in Theorem 5, we have the following result. Corollary 6 The Cesáro partial sums $$\sigma_3(z) = z + \frac{2}{3}z^2 + \frac{1}{3}z^3, \quad z \in U,$$ of the function $f(z) = \frac{z}{1-z}$ are starlike of order $\alpha = \frac{1}{5}$ .
Theorem 7 Theorem 7. Assume the partial sum as in Theorem 5. Then the function. Proof We consider such that This implies that therefore, a…
Theorem 7. Assume the partial sum $f_3(z)$ as in Theorem 5. Then the function $f_3(z) \in C(\frac{1}{5})$ . Proof We consider $\alpha$ such that $$\Re\left(1+\frac{zf_3''(z)}{f_3'(z)}\right)=\Re\left(3-\frac{2(\frac{k-1}{k}z+1)}{1+2\frac{k-1}{k}z+3\frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right)>\alpha.$$ This implies that $$\Re\left(\frac{\frac{k-1}{k}z+1}{1+2\frac{k-1}{k}z+3\frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right) < \frac{3-\alpha}{2},$$ therefore, a computation gives $$\Re\left(\frac{\frac{k-1}{k}z+1}{1+2\frac{k-1}{k}z+3\frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right) = \frac{1}{2} + \Re\left(\frac{\frac{1}{2}(1-3\frac{k-2}{k}z^2)}{1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})z+3(\frac{k-2}{k})z^2}\right),$$ thus $$\frac{\frac{1}{2}(1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2\cos^2\theta-1))}{1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})r\cos\theta+3(\frac{k-2}{k})(2\cos^2\theta-1)}<\frac{2-\alpha}{2}.$$ By putting $t = \cos \theta$ , we define the function G(t) as follows: $$G(t) = \frac{\frac{1}{2}(1 - 3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1))}{1 + 2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt + 3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2 - 1)}.$$ Logarithmic derivative of G(t) yields $$\begin{split} \frac{G'(t)}{G(t)} &= - \left\{ \frac{[12r^2\frac{k-2}{k}t][1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt+3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2-1)]}{[1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2-1)][1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt+3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2-1)]} \right. \\ &+ \frac{[12r^2\frac{k-2}{k}t+2r\frac{k-1}{k}][1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2-1)]}{[1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2-1)][1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt+3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2-1)]} \right\} \\ &:= - \left\{ \frac{H(t)}{[1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2-1)][1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt+3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2-1)]} \right\} \\ &= -\frac{At^2+Bt+C}{[1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2-1)][1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt+3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2-1)]}, \end{split}$$ where $$A = 12r^{3} \frac{(k-1)(k-2)}{k^{2}},$$ $$B = 12r^{2} \frac{k-2}{k} \left[ 2 + 3r^{2} \left( \frac{k-2}{k} \right) \right],$$ $$C = 2r \frac{k-1}{k} \left[ 1 + 3r^{2} \left( \frac{k-2}{k} \right) \right].$$ Now, for all $k \ge 3$ and $r \to 1$ , the function H(t) has unique real negative zeros in the interval $[-\frac{1}{2},0)$ . This leads to the fact that G'(t) has unique positive real zeros for all $k \ge 3$ in the interval $(0,\frac{1}{2}]$ . So, we calculate $\alpha$ in the interval $t \in (\frac{1}{2},1)$ . A computation yields G(t) is decreasing for $r \to 1$ in the interval $t \in (\frac{1}{2},1)$ . Thus, we have $$\lim_{t \to \infty} G(t) < \frac{9}{10} = \frac{2 - \alpha}{2}, \quad 1 > t > 0.5,$$ which implies $\alpha = \frac{1}{5}$ . This completes the
Theorem 8 Theorem 8. Assume the Cesáro partial sum of the function Then the function for all 0.2 < r < 0.5. Proof We consider such that This implies…
Theorem 8. Assume the Cesáro partial sum $$\sigma_3(z) = z + \frac{4}{3}z^2 + z^3$$ of the function $$f(z) = \frac{z}{(1-z)^2} = z + 2z^2 + 3z^3 + \cdots$$ Then the function $\sigma_3(z) \in \mathcal{C}(\frac{1}{2})$ for all 0.2 < r < 0.5. Proof We consider $\alpha$ such that $$\Re\left(1+\frac{z\sigma_3''(z)}{\sigma_3'(z)}\right)=\Re\left(3-\frac{2(\frac{4}{3}z+1)}{1+\frac{8}{3}z+3z^2}\right)>\alpha.$$ This implies that $$\Re\left(\frac{\frac{4}{3}z+1}{1+\frac{8}{3}z+3z^2}\right)<\frac{3-\alpha}{2},$$ therefore, a computation gives $$\Re\left(\frac{\frac{4}{3}z+1}{1+\frac{8}{3}z+3z^2}\right)=\frac{1}{2}+\Re\left(\frac{\frac{1}{2}(1-3z^2)}{1+\frac{8}{3}z+3z^2}\right),$$ thus $$\frac{1 - 3r^2(2\cos^2\theta - 1)}{1 + \frac{8}{2}r\cos\theta + 3(2\cos^2\theta - 1)} < 2 - \alpha.$$ By putting $t = \cos \theta$ , we define the function j(t) as follows: $$J(t) = \frac{1 - 3r^2(2t^2 - 1)}{1 + \frac{8}{3}rt + 3r^2(2t^2 - 1)}.$$ Logarithmic derivative of j(t) yields $$\begin{split} \frac{J'(t)}{J(t)} &:= -\left\{\frac{\hbar(t)}{[1-3r^2(2t^2-1)][1+\frac{8}{3}rt+3r^2(2t^2-1)]}\right\} \\ &= -\frac{16r^3t^2+24r^2t+\frac{8}{3}r(1+3r^2)}{[1-3r^2(2t^2-1)][1+\frac{8}{3}rt+3r^2(2t^2-1)]}. \end{split}$$ The function $\hbar(t)$ has a unique real negative zero in the interval $t \in (-1,0)$ for all 0.2 < r < 0.5 which is around $t \simeq -\frac{1}{2}$ . This leads to the fact that J'(t) has a unique positive real zero in the interval (0,1) around $t \simeq \frac{1}{2}$ . A computation yields J(t) is decreasing in the interval $t \in (\frac{1}{2},1)$ and assuming its maximums at t = 0.5 and t = 0.5. Thus, we have $$\lim_{t \to 0.5, t \to 0.5} J(t) < \frac{3}{2} = 2 - \alpha,$$ which implies $\alpha = \frac{1}{2}$ . This completes the proof. Note that some other results related to partial sums can be found in [11–15].
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Sharp Coefficient Estimates for Analytic Functions Subordinate to the Cusp Domai
2026
Sharp Coefficient Estimates for the Exponential Starlike class
2026
Results on Logarithmic Coefficients for the Class of Bounded Turning Functions
2025
The Third Hankel determinant for inverse coefficients of bounded turning functio
2025
New Developments in Geometric Function Theory II
2024
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 293 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback