Abstract
The aim of the present paper is to consider geometric properties such as starlikeness
and convexity of the Cesáro partial sums of certain analytic functions in the open unit
disk. By using the Cesáro partial sums, we improve some recent results including the
radius of convexity.
AMS Subject Classification: 30C45
Results & Lemmas (5)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 1 · radius
Theorem 1. The function satisfies (3) for Furthermore, for Proof Noting that it follows that for, we obtain Moreover, we also observe that…
Theorem 1. The function $S_k(z)$ satisfies
$$\frac{1 - |a_k| r^{k-1}}{1 - \frac{|a_k|}{k} r^{k-1}} \le \Re\left(\frac{z S_k'(z)}{S_k(z)}\right) \le \frac{1 + |a_k| r^{k-1}}{1 + \frac{|a_k|}{k} r^{k-1}}$$
(3)
for
$$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{k}{|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$
Furthermore, $S_k(z) \in S^*(\alpha)$ for
$$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{1-\alpha}{(1-\alpha/k)|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$
Proof Noting that
$$\frac{zS_k'(z)}{S_k(z)} = k - \frac{(k-1)}{1 + \frac{a_k}{k}z^{k-1}},$$
it follows that for $\cos \theta \rightarrow 1$ , we obtain
$$\Re\left(\frac{zS'_k(z)}{S_k(z)}\right) = k - (k-1)\frac{1 + \frac{|a_k|}{k}\cos\theta r^{k-1}}{1 + 2\frac{|a_k|}{k}r^{k-1}\cos\theta + (\frac{|a_k|}{k})^2 r^{2(k-1)}}$$
$$\leq \frac{1 + |a_k|r^{k-1}}{1 + \frac{|a_k|}{k}r^{k-1}}.$$
Moreover, we also observe that
$$\Re\left(\frac{zS'_k(z)}{S_k(z)}\right) \ge \frac{1 - |a_k| r^{k-1}}{1 - \frac{|a_k|}{k} r^{k-1}}.$$
Now assume that
$$\frac{1 - |a_k| r^{k-1}}{1 - \frac{|a_k|}{k} r^{k-1}} > \alpha$$
for
$$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{1-\alpha}{(1-\alpha/k)|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$
This completes the proof.
Remark 2 For example, the values $\alpha = 0.5$ , k = 2 and $|a_k| = 1$ imply the radius of starlikeness of $S_k(z)$ is r = 0.8164965..., and for the same values, the radius of starlikeness of the ordinary partial sums $f_k(z) = z + a_k z^k$ is r = 0.577350... (see [2]).
Next, we derive the radius of convexity.
Theorem 3 · radius
Theorem 3. The function satisfies for Furthermore, for Proof A computation gives Therefore, for, we obtain Moreover, we impose Now,…
Theorem 3. The function $S_k(z)$ satisfies
$$\frac{1 - k|a_k|r^{k-1}}{1 - |a_k|r^{k-1}} \le \Re\left(1 + \frac{zS_k''(z)}{S_k'(z)}\right) \le \frac{1 + k|a_k|r^{k-1}}{1 + |a_k|r^{k-1}} \tag{4}$$
for
$$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{1}{|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$
Furthermore, $S_k(z) \in C(\alpha)$ for
$$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{1-\alpha}{(k-\alpha)|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$
Proof A computation gives
$$1 + \frac{zS_k''(z)}{S_k'(z)} = k - \frac{(k-1)}{1 + a_k z^{k-1}}.$$
Therefore, for $\cos \theta \rightarrow 1$ , we obtain
$$\Re\left(1+\frac{zS_k''(z)}{S_k'(z)}\right) = k - (k-1)\frac{1+|a_k|\cos\theta r^{k-1}}{1+2|a_k|r^{k-1}\cos\theta + |a_k|^2r^{2(k-1)}}$$
$$\leq \frac{1+k|a_k|r^{k-1}}{1+|a_k|r^{k-1}}.$$
Moreover, we impose
$$\Re\left(1 + \frac{zS_k''(z)}{S_k'(z)}\right) \ge \frac{1 - k|a_k|r^{k-1}}{1 - |a_k|r^{k-1}}.$$
Now, consider that
$$\frac{1 - k|a_k|r^{k-1}}{1 - |a_k|r^{k-1}} > \alpha$$
for
$$0 \le r < \sqrt[k-1]{\frac{1-\alpha}{(k-\alpha)|a_k|}} \le 1, \quad |a_k| \ne 0.$$
This completes the proof.
Remark 4 In view of Theorem 3, for example, the values $\alpha = 0.5$ , k = 2 and $|a_k| = 1$ pose the radius of convexity of $S_k(z)$ is r = 0.577350... and for the same values, the radius of convexity of the ordinary partial sums $f_k(z) = z + a_k z^k$ is r = 0.4082... (see [2]).
Next, we assume special ordinary partial sums depending so that their coefficients satisfy the relation $|a_n| \le (\frac{k-n+1}{k})$ .
Theorem 5
Theorem 5. Assume the partial sum,. Then the function. Proof We consider such that This implies that that is, By letting, we define the…
Theorem 5. Assume the partial sum
$$f_3(z) = z + \frac{k-1}{k}z^2 + \frac{k-2}{k}z^3$$
, $k \ge 2$ .
Then the function $f_3(z) \in S^*(\frac{1}{2})$ .
Proof We consider $\alpha$ such that
$$\Re\left(\frac{zf_3'(z)}{f_3(z)}\right) = \Re\left(3 - \frac{2 + \frac{k-1}{k}z}{1 + \frac{k-1}{k}z + \frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right) > \alpha.$$
This implies that
$$\Re\left(\frac{2+\frac{k-1}{k}z}{1+\frac{k-1}{k}z+\frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right) < 3-\alpha,$$
that is,
$$\Re\left(\frac{1-\frac{k-1}{k}z^2}{1+\frac{k-1}{k}z+\frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right) = \frac{1-\frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2\cos^2\theta-1)}{1+\frac{k-1}{k}r\cos\theta+\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2\cos^2\theta-1)} < 2-\alpha.$$
By letting $t = \cos \theta$ , we define the function g(t) as follows:
$$g(t) = \frac{1 - \frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)}{1 + \frac{k-1}{k}rt + \frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)}.$$
Logarithmic derivative of g(t) yields
$$\begin{split} \frac{g'(t)}{g(t)} &= - \left\{ \frac{(4t\frac{k-1}{k}r^2)[1 + \frac{k-1}{k}rt + \frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)] + (\frac{k-1}{k}r + 4\frac{k-2}{k}r^2t)[1 - \frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)]}{[1 - \frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)][1 + \frac{k-1}{k}rt + \frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)]} \right\} \\ &:= - \left\{ \frac{h(t)}{[1 - \frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)][1 + \frac{k-1}{k}rt + \frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)]} \right\} \\ &= - \frac{At^2 + Bt + C}{[1 - \frac{k-1}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)][1 + \frac{k-1}{k}rt + \frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1)]}, \end{split}$$
where
$$A = 2r^{3} \left(\frac{k-1}{k}\right)^{2},$$
$$B = 4r^{2} \left[\frac{k-1}{k} + \frac{k-2}{k}\right],$$
$$C = \frac{k-1}{k} r \left[1 + \frac{k-1}{k} r^{2}\right].$$
Now, for all $k \ge 2$ and $r \to 1$ , the function h(t) has unique real negative zeros in the interval $(-\frac{1}{2},0)$ . This leads to the fact that g'(t) has unique positive real zeros for all $k \ge 2$
distributed in the interval $(0, \frac{1}{2})$ . Therefore, we will calculate $\alpha$ in $t \in [\frac{1}{2}, 1)$ . It is easy to check that g(t) is decreasing for $r \to 1$ in the interval $[\frac{1}{2}, 1)$ . Moreover, we have
$$\lim_{k \to \infty} g\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = \lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{1 + \frac{k-1}{2k}}{1 + \frac{k-1}{2k} - \frac{k-2}{2k}} = \frac{3}{2}.$$
We conclude that for $t \in [\frac{1}{2}, 1)$ ,
$$g(t) < g\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) \le \frac{3}{2} = 2 - \alpha,$$
thus $\alpha = \frac{1}{2}$ . This completes the proof.
By letting k = 3 in Theorem 5, we have the following result.
Corollary 6 The Cesáro partial sums
$$\sigma_3(z) = z + \frac{2}{3}z^2 + \frac{1}{3}z^3, \quad z \in U,$$
of the function $f(z) = \frac{z}{1-z}$ are starlike of order $\alpha = \frac{1}{5}$ .
Theorem 7
Theorem 7. Assume the partial sum as in Theorem 5. Then the function. Proof We consider such that This implies that therefore, a…
Theorem 7. Assume the partial sum $f_3(z)$ as in Theorem 5. Then the function $f_3(z) \in C(\frac{1}{5})$ .
Proof We consider $\alpha$ such that
$$\Re\left(1+\frac{zf_3''(z)}{f_3'(z)}\right)=\Re\left(3-\frac{2(\frac{k-1}{k}z+1)}{1+2\frac{k-1}{k}z+3\frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right)>\alpha.$$
This implies that
$$\Re\left(\frac{\frac{k-1}{k}z+1}{1+2\frac{k-1}{k}z+3\frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right) < \frac{3-\alpha}{2},$$
therefore, a computation gives
$$\Re\left(\frac{\frac{k-1}{k}z+1}{1+2\frac{k-1}{k}z+3\frac{k-2}{k}z^2}\right) = \frac{1}{2} + \Re\left(\frac{\frac{1}{2}(1-3\frac{k-2}{k}z^2)}{1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})z+3(\frac{k-2}{k})z^2}\right),$$
thus
$$\frac{\frac{1}{2}(1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2\cos^2\theta-1))}{1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})r\cos\theta+3(\frac{k-2}{k})(2\cos^2\theta-1)}<\frac{2-\alpha}{2}.$$
By putting $t = \cos \theta$ , we define the function G(t) as follows:
$$G(t) = \frac{\frac{1}{2}(1 - 3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2 - 1))}{1 + 2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt + 3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2 - 1)}.$$
Logarithmic derivative of G(t) yields
$$\begin{split} \frac{G'(t)}{G(t)} &= - \left\{ \frac{[12r^2\frac{k-2}{k}t][1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt+3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2-1)]}{[1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2-1)][1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt+3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2-1)]} \right. \\ &+ \frac{[12r^2\frac{k-2}{k}t+2r\frac{k-1}{k}][1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2-1)]}{[1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2-1)][1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt+3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2-1)]} \right\} \\ &:= - \left\{ \frac{H(t)}{[1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2-1)][1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt+3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2-1)]} \right\} \\ &= -\frac{At^2+Bt+C}{[1-3\frac{k-2}{k}r^2(2t^2-1)][1+2(\frac{k-1}{k})rt+3r^2(\frac{k-2}{k})(2t^2-1)]}, \end{split}$$
where
$$A = 12r^{3} \frac{(k-1)(k-2)}{k^{2}},$$
$$B = 12r^{2} \frac{k-2}{k} \left[ 2 + 3r^{2} \left( \frac{k-2}{k} \right) \right],$$
$$C = 2r \frac{k-1}{k} \left[ 1 + 3r^{2} \left( \frac{k-2}{k} \right) \right].$$
Now, for all $k \ge 3$ and $r \to 1$ , the function H(t) has unique real negative zeros in the interval $[-\frac{1}{2},0)$ . This leads to the fact that G'(t) has unique positive real zeros for all $k \ge 3$ in the interval $(0,\frac{1}{2}]$ . So, we calculate $\alpha$ in the interval $t \in (\frac{1}{2},1)$ . A computation yields G(t) is decreasing for $r \to 1$ in the interval $t \in (\frac{1}{2},1)$ . Thus, we have
$$\lim_{t \to \infty} G(t) < \frac{9}{10} = \frac{2 - \alpha}{2}, \quad 1 > t > 0.5,$$
which implies $\alpha = \frac{1}{5}$ . This completes the
Theorem 8
Theorem 8. Assume the Cesáro partial sum of the function Then the function for all 0.2 < r < 0.5. Proof We consider such that This implies…
Theorem 8. Assume the Cesáro partial sum
$$\sigma_3(z) = z + \frac{4}{3}z^2 + z^3$$
of the function
$$f(z) = \frac{z}{(1-z)^2} = z + 2z^2 + 3z^3 + \cdots$$
Then the function $\sigma_3(z) \in \mathcal{C}(\frac{1}{2})$ for all 0.2 < r < 0.5.
Proof We consider $\alpha$ such that
$$\Re\left(1+\frac{z\sigma_3''(z)}{\sigma_3'(z)}\right)=\Re\left(3-\frac{2(\frac{4}{3}z+1)}{1+\frac{8}{3}z+3z^2}\right)>\alpha.$$
This implies that
$$\Re\left(\frac{\frac{4}{3}z+1}{1+\frac{8}{3}z+3z^2}\right)<\frac{3-\alpha}{2},$$
therefore, a computation gives
$$\Re\left(\frac{\frac{4}{3}z+1}{1+\frac{8}{3}z+3z^2}\right)=\frac{1}{2}+\Re\left(\frac{\frac{1}{2}(1-3z^2)}{1+\frac{8}{3}z+3z^2}\right),$$
thus
$$\frac{1 - 3r^2(2\cos^2\theta - 1)}{1 + \frac{8}{2}r\cos\theta + 3(2\cos^2\theta - 1)} < 2 - \alpha.$$
By putting $t = \cos \theta$ , we define the function j(t) as follows:
$$J(t) = \frac{1 - 3r^2(2t^2 - 1)}{1 + \frac{8}{3}rt + 3r^2(2t^2 - 1)}.$$
Logarithmic derivative of j(t) yields
$$\begin{split} \frac{J'(t)}{J(t)} &:= -\left\{\frac{\hbar(t)}{[1-3r^2(2t^2-1)][1+\frac{8}{3}rt+3r^2(2t^2-1)]}\right\} \\ &= -\frac{16r^3t^2+24r^2t+\frac{8}{3}r(1+3r^2)}{[1-3r^2(2t^2-1)][1+\frac{8}{3}rt+3r^2(2t^2-1)]}. \end{split}$$
The function $\hbar(t)$ has a unique real negative zero in the interval $t \in (-1,0)$ for all 0.2 < r < 0.5 which is around $t \simeq -\frac{1}{2}$ . This leads to the fact that J'(t) has a unique positive real zero in the interval (0,1) around $t \simeq \frac{1}{2}$ . A computation yields J(t) is decreasing in the interval $t \in (\frac{1}{2},1)$ and assuming its maximums at t = 0.5 and t = 0.5. Thus, we have
$$\lim_{t \to 0.5, t \to 0.5} J(t) < \frac{3}{2} = 2 - \alpha,$$
<span id="page-7-0"></span>which implies $\alpha = \frac{1}{2}$ . This completes the proof.
<span id="page-7-1"></span>Note that some other results related to partial sums can be found in [11–15].
Function classes studied:
Related Papers