Abstract
In the present paper, we give an extension of the idea which was introduced by
Sakaguchi (J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 11:72-75, 1959), and we give some applications of this
extended idea for the investigation of the class of harmonic mappings.
MSC: Primary 30C45; 30C55
Results & Lemmas (8)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 1.1
Theorem 1.1. [5] Let, then (1.4) and <span id="page-1-2"></span> <span id="page-1-0"></span>where (1.6) <span id="page-1-1"></span>for all…
Theorem 1.1. [5] Let $s(z) \in \mathcal{S}_{\alpha}^*$ , then
$$rF(\cos\alpha, -r) \le |s(z)| \le rF(\cos\alpha, r)$$
(1.4)
and
<span id="page-1-2"></span>
$$[(1-r)\cos\alpha - (1+r)\sin\alpha]F(\cos\alpha, -r)$$
$$\leq |s'(z)| \leq [(1+r)\cos\alpha + (1-r)\sin\alpha]F(\cos\alpha, r), \tag{1.5}$$
<span id="page-1-0"></span>where
$$F(\cos\alpha, r) = \frac{1}{(1+r)^{\cos\alpha(\cos\alpha-1)}(1-r)^{\cos\alpha(\cos\alpha+1)}}$$
(1.6)
<span id="page-1-1"></span>for all |z| = r < 1 and $|\alpha| < \pi/2$ .
Lemma 1.2
Lemma 1.2. [6] Let be regular in the unit disc with, then if attains its maximum value on the circle |z| = r at the point, one has for some.
Lemma 1.2. [6] Let $\phi(z)$ be regular in the unit disc $\mathbb{D}$ with $\phi(0) = 0$ , then if $|\phi(z)|$ attains its maximum value on the circle |z| = r at the point $z_1$ , one has $z_1\phi'(z_1) = k\phi(z_1)$ for some $k \ge 1$ .
Lemma 1.3
Lemma 1.3. [7] If and are regular in,, maps onto a many-sheeted region which is starlike with respect to the origin, and, then.
Lemma 1.3. [7] If $s_1(z)$ and $s_2(z)$ are regular in $\mathbb{D}$ , $s_1(0) = s_2(0)$ , $s_2(z)$ maps $\mathbb{D}$ onto a many-sheeted region which is starlike with respect to the origin, and $s_1'(z)/s_2'(z) \in \mathcal{P}$ , then $s_1(z)/s_2(z) \in \mathcal{P}$ .
Lemma 1.4
Lemma 1.4. [8] Let be an element of, then for all |z| = r < 1. This inequality is sharp because the extremal function is <span…
Lemma 1.4. [8] Let $f = h(z) + \overline{g(z)}$ be an element of $S_{\mathcal{HPST}(\alpha)^*}$ , then
$$\frac{|b_1| - r}{1 - |b_1|r} \le \left| \frac{g'(z)}{h'(z)} \right| \le \frac{|b_1| + r}{1 + |b_1|r} \tag{1.7}$$
for all |z| = r < 1. This inequality is sharp because the extremal function is
<span id="page-2-0"></span>
$$e^{i\alpha}\frac{g'(z)}{h'(z)}=\frac{z+b}{1+\bar{b}z},$$
where $b = e^{i\alpha}b_1$ .
Theorem 2.1
Theorem 2.1. if and only if for all. Proof Let s(z) in, then we have or for some and all. Thus <span id="page-2-2"></span>for some and all.…
Theorem 2.1. $s(z) \in \mathcal{S}_{\alpha}^*$ if and only if
$$z\frac{s'(z)}{s(z)} - 1 < \frac{2\cos\alpha e^{-i\alpha}z}{1 - z} \tag{2.1}$$
for all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ .
Proof Let s(z) in $\mathcal{S}_{\alpha}^*$ , then we have
$$e^{i\alpha}z\frac{s'(z)}{s(z)} = \cos\alpha\frac{1+\phi(z)}{1-\phi(z)} + i\sin\alpha$$
or
$$e^{i\alpha}z\frac{s'(z)}{s(z)} = e^{i\alpha}\frac{1+\phi(z)}{1-\phi(z)}$$
for some $\phi(z) \in \Omega$ and all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ . Thus
$$z\frac{s'(z)}{s(z)} - 1 = \frac{1 + e^{-2i\alpha}\phi(z)}{1 - \phi(z)} - 1$$
$$= \frac{1 + (\cos 2\alpha - i\sin 2\alpha)\phi(z) - 1 + \phi(z)}{1 - \phi(z)}$$
$$= \frac{2\cos \alpha e^{-i\alpha}\phi(z)}{1 - \phi(z)}$$
<span id="page-2-2"></span>for some $\phi(z) \in \Omega$ and all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ . Since $\phi(z) \in \Omega$ , we have that (2.1) is true. The sufficient part of the proof can be seen by following the above steps in the opposite direction by considering the subordination principle.
Theorem 2.2
Theorem 2.2. Let be an element of. If, then for all. Proof A version of this theorem was proved by Sakaguchi for a univalent starlike…
Theorem 2.2. Let $f = h(z) + \overline{g(z)}$ be an element of $S_{\mathcal{H}(\alpha)}$ . If $w(z) = \frac{g'(z)}{h'(z)} \in \mathcal{P}$ , then $\frac{g(z)}{h(z)} \in \mathcal{P}$ for all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ .
Proof A version of this theorem was proved by Sakaguchi for a univalent starlike function [7, 9]. Since $f = h(z) + \overline{g(z)} \in \mathcal{S}_{\mathcal{H}(\alpha)}$ , then h(z) and g(z) are regular in $\mathbb{D}$ and h(0) = g(0) = 0. On the other hand, we have
<span id="page-2-1"></span>
$$w(z) = \frac{g'(z)}{h'(z)} \in \mathcal{P} \quad \text{if and only if} \quad \frac{g'(z)}{h'(z)} < \frac{1+z}{1+z}$$
(2.2)
for all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ . Geometrically, this means that $\frac{g'(z)}{h'(z)}$ maps $\mathbb{D}$ inside the open disc centered on the real axis with diameter end points $\frac{1-r}{1+r}$ and $\frac{1+r}{1-r}$ . Now we define a function $\phi(z)$ by
<span id="page-3-0"></span>
$$\frac{g(z)}{h(z)} = \frac{1 + \phi(z)}{1 - \phi(z)} \quad (z \in \mathbb{D}). \tag{2.3}$$
Then $\phi(z)$ is analytic in $\mathbb{D}$ , and $\phi(0) = 0$ . On the other hand,
$$w(z) = \frac{g'(z)}{h'(z)} = \frac{2z\phi'(z)}{1 - \phi(z)} \frac{1}{e^{i\alpha}(1 + e^{-2i\alpha})\phi(z)} + \frac{1 + \phi(z)}{1 - \phi(z)} \quad (z \in \mathbb{D}).$$
(2.4)
Now, it is easy to realize that the subordination (2.2) is equivalent to $|\phi(z)| < 1$ in (2.3) for all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ . Indeed, assume to the contrary that there exists $z_1 \in \mathbb{D}$ such that $|\phi(z_1)| = 1$ . Then by Jack's lemma (Lemma 1.2), $z_1\phi'(z_1) = k\phi(z_1)$ , $k \ge 1$ , for such $z_1$ we have
$$w(z_1) = \frac{g'(z_1)}{h'(z_1)} = \frac{2k\phi(z_1)}{1-\phi(z_1)} \frac{1}{e^{i\alpha}(1+e^{-2i\alpha})\phi(z_1)} + \frac{1+\phi(z_1)}{1-\phi(z_1)} = w\big(\phi(z_1)\big) \notin w(\mathbb{D}),$$
since $|\phi(z_1)| = 1$ and $k \ge 1$ . But this is a contradiction to the condition $w(z) = \frac{g'(z)}{h'(z)} < \frac{1+z}{1-z}$ , and so the assumption is wrong, i.e., $|\phi(z)| < 1$ for all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ .
Remark 2.3 Theorem 2.2 is an extension of Lemma 1.3 to the harmonic mappings.
Corollary 2.4
Corollary 2.4. Let be an element of, then and where is given by (1.6) for all |z| = r < 1 and. Proof The proof of this theorem is a simple…
Corollary 2.4. Let $f = h(z) + \overline{g(z)}$ be an element of $S_{\mathcal{H}(\alpha)}$ , then
$$\frac{r(1-r)}{1+r}F(\cos\alpha, -r) \le \left| g(z) \right| \le \frac{r(1+r)}{1-r}F(\cos\alpha, r) \tag{2.5}$$
and
$$\left[ (1-r)\cos\alpha - (1+r)\sin\alpha \right] \frac{1-r}{1+r} F(\cos\alpha, -r)
\leq \left| g'(z) \right| \leq \left[ (1+r)\cos\alpha + (1-r)\sin\alpha \right] \frac{1+r}{1-r} F(\cos\alpha, r), \tag{2.6}$$
where $F(\cos \alpha, r)$ is given by (1.6) for all |z| = r < 1 and $|\alpha| < \pi/2$ .
Proof The proof of this theorem is a simple consequence of Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 2.2 since
$$\operatorname{Re} w(z) = \operatorname{Re} \frac{g'(z)}{h'(z)} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \frac{g'(z)}{h'(z)} \prec \frac{1+z}{1-z} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \frac{1-r}{1+r} \leq \left| \frac{g'(z)}{h'(z)} \right| \leq \frac{1+r}{1-r},$$
then
$$\left|h'(z)\right| \frac{1-r}{1+r} \le \left|g'(z)\right| \le \left|h'(z)\right| \frac{1+r}{1-r}$$
and
$$\operatorname{Re} \frac{g(z)}{h(z)} > 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad \frac{g(z)}{h(z)} \prec \frac{1+z}{1-z} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \frac{1-r}{1+r} \le \left| \frac{g(z)}{h(z)} \right| \le \frac{1+r}{1-r},$$
then
$$\left|h(z)\right| \frac{1-r}{1+r} \le \left|g(z)\right| \le \left|h(z)\right| \frac{1+r}{1-r}.$$
Corollary 2.5
Corollary 2.5. Let be an element of, then where is given by (1.6) for all |z| = r < 1, and is the Jacobian of f defined by for all. <span…
Corollary 2.5. Let $f = h(z) + \overline{g(z)}$ be an element of $S_{\mathcal{H}(\alpha)}$ , then
$$\begin{split} & \frac{[(1-r)\cos\alpha - (1+r)\sin\alpha]^2 (F(\cos\alpha, -r))^2 (1-r^2)(1-|b_1|^2)}{(1+|b_1|r)^2} \\ & \leq J_{f(z)} \leq \frac{[(1+r)\cos\alpha + (1-r)\sin\alpha]^2 (F(\cos\alpha, r))^2 (1-r^2)(1-|b_1|^2)}{(1-|b_1|r)^2}, \end{split}$$
where $F(\cos \alpha, r)$ is given by (1.6) for all |z| = r < 1, $|\alpha| < \pi/2$ and $J_{f(z)}$ is the Jacobian of f defined by $J_{f(z)} = |h'(z)|^2 - |g'(z)|^2$ for all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ .
<span id="page-4-0"></span>Proof The proof of this corollary is a simple consequence of Lemma 1.1 and Lemma 1.4.
Function classes studied:
Related Papers