🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

In this paper we consider some properties of the initial logarithmic coefficients for inverse functions of functions univalent in the unit disc. The case of convex functions is treated separately. We give estimate, in some cases sharp, of the modulus of the initial coefficients, as well as the difference of the modulus of two consecutive coefficients.

Results & Lemmas (7)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1 Theorem 1. Let and let be initial logarithmic coefficients of its inverse function given by (5). Then the following sharp inequalities hold…
Theorem 1. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}$ and let $\Gamma_1, \Gamma_2, \Gamma_3$ be initial logarithmic coefficients of its inverse function $f^{-1}$ given by (5). Then the following sharp inequalities hold - (i) $|\Gamma_1| \leq 1$ ; - $\begin{array}{c|c} (ii) & |\Gamma_2| \leq \frac{3}{2}; \\ (iii) & |\Gamma_3| \leq \frac{10}{3}. \end{array}$
Theorem 2 Theorem 2. Let be given by (1), and let and be the first two initial logarithmic coefficients of the function. Then The upper bound is…
Theorem 2. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}$ be given by (1), and let $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$ be the first two initial logarithmic coefficients of the function $f^{-1}$ . Then $$-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} \le |\Gamma_2| - |\Gamma_1| \le \frac{1}{2}.$$ The upper bound is sharp.
Theorem 3 · coeff Theorem 3. Let be given by (1), and let and be the logarithmic coefficients of its inverse function. Then The bound is sharp. Proof. From…
Theorem 3. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}$ be given by (1), and let $\Gamma_2$ and $\Gamma_3$ be the logarithmic coefficients of its inverse function $f^{-1}$ . Then $$|\Gamma_3| - |\Gamma_2| \le \frac{11}{6}.$$ The bound is sharp. Proof. From the proof of parts (ii) and (iii) of Theorem 1 we have $$\Gamma_2 = \frac{1}{2} \left( A_3 - \frac{1}{2} A_2^2 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left( -a_3 + \frac{3}{2} a_2^2 \right)$$ and $$\Gamma_3 = \frac{1}{2} \left( A_4 - A_2 A_3 + \frac{1}{3} A_2^3 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left( -a_4 + 4a_2 a_3 - \frac{10}{3} a_2^3 \right).$$ Since $|a_2|/2 < 1$ , $$|\Gamma_3| - |\Gamma_2| \le |\Gamma_3| - \frac{|a_2|}{2} |\Gamma_2| \le \left| \Gamma_3 - \frac{a_2}{2} \Gamma_2 \right|$$ $$= \frac{1}{2} \left| -a_4 + \frac{7}{2} a_2 a_3 - \frac{31}{12} a_2^3 \right|.$$ Using the relations (10), after some computations, we get $$|\Gamma_3| - |\Gamma_2| \leq \left|\omega_{33} - 3\omega_{11}\omega_{13} + \frac{3}{2}\omega_{11}^3\right| \leq |\omega_{33}| + \frac{3}{2}|\omega_{11}| \cdot |2\omega_{13} - \omega_{11}^2|.$$ Hence, applying (9) and (12), $$|\Gamma_3| - |\Gamma_2| \leq \frac{1}{3} \sqrt{1 - 3|\omega_{13}|^2} + \frac{3}{2} |\omega_{11}| \leq \frac{11}{6} \ .$$ Note that for Koebe function we have $|\Gamma_2| = \frac{3}{2}$ and $|\Gamma_3| = \frac{10}{3}$ , so in this case $$|\Gamma_3| - |\Gamma_2| = \frac{11}{6}$$ showing the sharpness of the estimate.
Lemma 1 · coeff Lemma 1. [9] For and, we have The inequality is sharp with extremal function where.
Lemma 1. [9] For $f \in \mathcal{C}$ and $f(z) = z + a_2 z^2 + a_3 z^3 + \cdots$ , we have $$|a_3 - a_2^2| \le \frac{1}{3}(1 - |a_2|^2).$$ The inequality is sharp with extremal function $$f_{\lambda}(z) = \int_{0}^{z} \left(\frac{1+t}{1-t}\right)^{\lambda} \frac{1}{1-t^{2}} dt = z + \lambda z^{2} + \frac{1}{3} (2\lambda^{2} + 1)z^{3} + \frac{1}{3} (\lambda^{3} + 2\lambda)z^{4} + \cdots,$$ where $0 < \lambda < 1$ .
Lemma 2 Lemma 2. [8] If is analytic in, satisfies the condition,, and if then the following sharp estimate holds, where with and Here we used the…
Lemma 2. [8] If $\omega(z) = c_1 z + c_2 z^2 + c_3 z^3 + \cdots$ is analytic in $\mathbb{D}$ , satisfies the condition $|\omega(z)| < 1$ , $z \in \mathbb{D}$ , and if $$\Psi(\omega) = |c_3 + \mu c_1 c_2 + \nu c_1^3|,$$ then the following sharp estimate $\Psi(\omega) \leq \Phi(\mu, \nu)$ holds, where $$\Phi(\mu,\nu) = \begin{cases} |\nu|, & (\mu,\nu) \in D_6, \\ \frac{2}{3}(|\mu|+1) \left(\frac{|\mu|+1}{3(|\mu|+1+\nu)}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}, & (\mu,\nu) \in D_8 \end{cases},$$ with $$D_6 = \left\{ (\mu, \nu) : 2 \le |\mu| \le 4, \ \nu \ge \frac{1}{12} (\mu^2 + 8) \right\}$$ and $$D_8 = \left\{ (\mu, \nu) : \frac{1}{2} \le |\mu| \le 2, \ -\frac{2}{3} (|\mu| + 1) \le \nu \le \frac{4}{27} (|\mu| + 1)^3 - (|\mu| + 1) \right\}.$$ Here we used the notations from [8]. It is known (see, Ponnusamy et al, [7]) that
Theorem 4 · coeff Theorem 4. Let, be given by (4), and let,, be its first three logarithmic coefficients. Then - (i); (ii);. All estimates are sharp. We…
Theorem 4. Let $f \in \mathcal{C}$ , $f^{-1}$ be given by (4), and let $\Gamma_1$ , $\Gamma_2$ , $\Gamma_3$ be its first three logarithmic coefficients. Then - (i) $|\Gamma_1| \le \frac{1}{2}$ ; (ii) $|\Gamma_2| \le \frac{1}{4}$ ; $$(iii)$$ $|\Gamma_3| \leq \frac{1}{6}$ . All estimates are sharp. We shall find the lower and the upper bound of the differences $|\Gamma_2| - |\Gamma_1|$ and $|\Gamma_3| - |\Gamma_2|$ when $f \in \mathcal{C}$ . For the second difference we need to express coefficients of $f \in \mathcal{C}$ in terms of appropriate coefficients of a Schwarz function $\omega$ . From the definition of convex functions we have $$1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} = \frac{1 + \omega(z)}{1 - \omega(z)}, \qquad |\omega(z)| < 1, z \in \mathbb{D},$$ and from here $$[zf'(z)]' = \{1 + 2[\omega(z) + \omega^2(z) + \cdots]\} \cdot f'(z).$$ If we put $f(z) = z + a_2 z^2 + a_3 z^3 + \cdots$ and $\omega(z) = c_1 z + c_2 z^2 + c_3 z^3 + \cdots$ , then from the last relation, after comparing the coefficients, we get (14) $$a_2 = c_1,$$ $$a_3 = \frac{1}{3}(c_2 + 3c_1^2),$$ $$a_4 = \frac{1}{6}(c_3 + 5c_1c_2 + 6c_1^3).$$ Now, we are ready to prove the final theorem.
Theorem 5 · coeff Theorem 5. Let and let be given by (4). Also, let,, be its initial logarithmic coefficients. Then (ii). All inequalities are sharp. Proof.…
Theorem 5. Let $f \in \mathcal{C}$ and let $f^{-1}$ be given by (4). Also, let $\Gamma_1$ , $\Gamma_2$ , $\Gamma_3$ be its initial logarithmic coefficients. Then $$\begin{array}{ll} (i) & -\frac{\sqrt{10}}{10} \leq |\Gamma_2| - |\Gamma_1| \leq \frac{1}{6}. \\ (ii) & |\Gamma_3| - |\Gamma_2| \leq \frac{2\sqrt{10}}{75}. \end{array}$$ (ii) $$|\Gamma_3| - |\Gamma_2| \le \frac{2\sqrt{10}}{75}$$ . All inequalities are sharp. Proof. (i) Using similar consideration as in Theorem 3, the result of Lemma 2, and $|a_2| \leq 1$ , for the upper bound we get $$\begin{aligned} |\Gamma_2| - |\Gamma_1| &= \frac{1}{2} \left| -a_3 + \frac{3}{2} a_2^2 \right| - \frac{1}{2} |-a_2| \\ &= \frac{1}{2} \left| (-a_3 + a_2^2) + \frac{1}{2} a_2^2 \right| - \frac{1}{2} |a_2| \\ &\leq \frac{1}{2} |a_3 - a_2^2| + \frac{1}{4} |a_2|^2 - \frac{1}{2} |a_2| \\ &\leq \frac{1}{6} (1 - |a_2|^2) + \frac{1}{4} |a_2|^2 - \frac{1}{2} |a_2| \\ &\leq \frac{1}{6}. \end{aligned}$$ The inequality is sharp for the function $f_0(z) = z + \frac{1}{3}z^3 + \cdots$ given in Lemma 1. The lower bound of the inequality is equivalent with (15) $$\left| -a_3 + \frac{3}{2}a_2^2 \right| \ge |a_2| - \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}.$$ If $0 \le |a_2| < \sqrt{2/5}$ , then the inequality (15) obviously holds. Now, let $\sqrt{2/5} \le |a_2| \le 1$ . Then, using Lemma 2, since $$\left| -a_3 + \frac{3}{2}a_2^2 \right| \ge \frac{1}{2}|a_2|^2 - |-a_3 + a_2^2|$$ $$\ge \frac{1}{2}|a_2|^2 - \frac{1}{3}(1 - |a_2|^2)$$ $$= \frac{5}{6}|a_2|^2 - \frac{1}{3},$$ we conclude that to prove (15) it is enough to show that $$\frac{5}{6}|a_2|^2 - \frac{1}{3} \ge |a_2| - \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}.$$ The last inequality is equivalent to $$\left(|a_2| - \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}\right) \left(\frac{5}{6} \left(|a_2| + \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}\right) - 1\right) \ge 0,$$ which is true since by assumption $|a_2| - \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}} \ge 0$ and $\frac{5}{6} \left( |a_2| + \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}} \right) - 1 \ge \frac{5}{6} \cdot 2\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}} - 1 = \sqrt{\frac{10}{9}} - 1 > 0$ . This proves the inequality (15) and the lower bound of (i). (ii) In the proof of Theorem 3 we obtained that $\Gamma_2 = \frac{1}{2} \left( -a_3 + \frac{3}{2} a_2^2 \right)$ and $\Gamma_3 = \frac{1}{2} \left( -a_4 + 4a_2a_3 - \frac{10}{3}a_2^3 \right)$ . Since $|a_2| \le 1$ , so also $|a_2| \le \frac{5}{4}$ and $-1 \le -\frac{4}{5}|a_2|$ . Therefore, $$|\Gamma_3| - |\Gamma_2| \le |\Gamma_3| - \frac{4}{5}|a_2||\Gamma_2|$$ $$\le \left|\Gamma_3 + \frac{4}{5}a_2\Gamma_2\right|$$ $$= \frac{1}{2}\left|a_4 - \frac{16}{5}a_2a_3 + \frac{32}{15}a_2^3\right|.$$ Using (14) and Lemma 2 (case $D_8$ ), after some calculations, we get $$|\Gamma_3| - |\Gamma_2| \le \frac{1}{12} \left| c_3 - \frac{7}{5} c_1 c_2 - \frac{2}{5} c_1^3 \right| \le \frac{1}{12} \cdot \frac{8}{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}} = \frac{2\sqrt{10}}{75}.$$ For showing the sharpness, it is enough to consider the function $f_{\lambda}$ from Lemma 1 with $\lambda = \sqrt{2/5}$ , i.e., $$f_{\sqrt{2/5}}(z) = z + \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}z^2 + \frac{3}{5}z^3 + \frac{4}{5}\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}z^4 \cdots,$$ such that $$a_2 = \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}$$ , $a_3 = \frac{3}{5}$ , and $a_4 = \frac{4}{5}\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}$ , and further, $$\Gamma_1 = -\frac{\sqrt{10}}{10} \ , \quad \Gamma_2 = 0 \quad \mbox{ and } \quad \Gamma_3 = \frac{2\sqrt{10}}{75} \ .$$ The above means that all inequalities in Theorem 5 are sharp.

Related Papers

On some properties of bi-univalent functions in the unit disc
2026
Toeplitz and symmetric Toeplitz determinants for inverse functions of certain cl
2025
Symmetric Toeplitz determinants of some classes of univalent functions
2025
New criteria for starlikeness in the unit disc
2024
An improvement of the estimates of the modulus of the Hankel determinants of sec
2024
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 278 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback